All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Song Bao Hua <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Avoid a second scan of target in select_idle_cpu
Date: Wed,  4 Aug 2021 12:58:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210804115857.6253-3-mgorman@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210804115857.6253-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net>

When select_idle_cpu starts scanning for an idle CPU, it starts with
a target CPU that has already been checked by select_idle_sibling.
This patch starts with the next CPU instead.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8ad7666f387c..f412b4504378 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6249,7 +6249,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
 		time = cpu_clock(this);
 	}
 
-	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
+	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target + 1) {
 		if (has_idle_core) {
 			i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
 			if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-04 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-04 11:58 [PATCH 0/2] Reduce SIS scanning Mel Gorman
2021-08-04 11:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Use prev instead of new target as recent_used_cpu Mel Gorman
2021-08-05  9:34   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Mel Gorman
2021-08-04 11:58 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2021-08-05  9:34   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Avoid a second scan of target in select_idle_cpu tip-bot2 for Mel Gorman
2021-08-04 13:11 ` [PATCH 0/2] Reduce SIS scanning Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210804115857.6253-3-mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.