From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:37:18 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v1] virtio-mmio: Specify wait needed in driver during reset Message-ID: <20210816103348-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20210726091851-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20210726141737-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <09b74816-8a1e-f993-640f-eb790a4a4698@redhat.com> <20210811100550.GC21582@quicinc.com> <2723b42a-f5d0-9c49-bf5c-302fbd4c947f@redhat.com> <20210816013138-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20210816063550.GD5604@quicinc.com> <20210816074558-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20210816133451.GA8203@quicinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210816133451.GA8203@quicinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Cc: Jason Wang , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Cornelia Huck , "virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org" , Trilok Soni , Pratik Patel List-ID: On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 07:04:51PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > * Michael S. Tsirkin [2021-08-16 07:48:56]: > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:05:50PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > > > * Michael S. Tsirkin [2021-08-16 01:35:46]: > > > > > > > So thinking about all this, quite early in the setup process we > > > > have: > > > > > > > > /* Figure out what features the device supports. */ > > > > device_features = dev->config->get_features(dev); > > > > > > > > > > > > isn't this sufficient? this will flush out > > > > all writes and device can defer responding to reads > > > > until reset is complete. > > > > > > Hmm not sure if that's possible in all MMIO devices? I think a while back Jason > > > felt some of the MMIO devices, their registers could act as plain DRAM for > > > reads, which means device can't block such reads? > > > > > > - vatsa > > > > Is it worth bothering about theoretical issues though? Jason what is > > your take? > > What about the case where device reset fails, which may require driver to > initiate reset again or give up on device? Won't the read of features be forever > deferred in that case? > > - vatsa That might be worth addressing but I feel your proposal does not address it sufficiently. > --- > > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is submitting the attached "feedback" as a > non-member to the virtio-dev mailing list for consideration and inclusion.