Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Updates to powerpc for robust CPU online/offline

[Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [2021-08-23 10:33:30]:

> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 03:55:32PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > Scheduler expects unique number of node distances to be available
> > at boot. It uses node distance to calculate this unique node
> > distances. On Power Servers, node distances for offline nodes is not
> > available. However, Power Servers already knows unique possible node
> > distances. Fake the offline node's distance_lookup_table entries so
> > that all possible node distances are updated.
> > 
> > For example distance info from numactl from a fully populated 8 node
> > system at boot may look like this.
> > 
> > node distances:
> > node   0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
> >   0:  10  20  40  40  40  40  40  40
> >   1:  20  10  40  40  40  40  40  40
> >   2:  40  40  10  20  40  40  40  40
> >   3:  40  40  20  10  40  40  40  40
> >   4:  40  40  40  40  10  20  40  40
> >   5:  40  40  40  40  20  10  40  40
> >   6:  40  40  40  40  40  40  10  20
> >   7:  40  40  40  40  40  40  20  10
> > 
> > However the same system when only two nodes are online at boot, then
> > distance info from numactl will look like
> > node distances:
> > node   0   1
> >   0:  10  20
> >   1:  20  10
> > 
> > With the faked numa distance at boot, the node distance table will look
> > like
> > node   0   1   2
> >   0:  10  20  40
> >   1:  20  10  40
> >   2:  40  40  10
> > 
> > The actual distance will be populated once the nodes are onlined.
> 
> How did you want all this merged? I picked up Valentin's patch, do you
> want me to pick up these PowerPC patches in the same tree, or do you
> want to route them seperately?

While both (the patch you accepted and this series) together help solve the
problem, I think there is no hard dependency between the two. Hence I would
think it should be okay to go through the powerpc tree.


-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju