All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco@gmail.com>,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootconfig: Fix missing return check of xbc_node_compose_key function
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 17:04:37 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210831170437.2edec726afc4731f481e7c5f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210831164046.b62e20443e2a1852d91b87bb@kernel.org>

Hi,

On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 16:40:46 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:32:56 -0300
> Julio Faracco <jcfaracco@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > The function `xbc_show_list should` handle the keys during the
> > composition. Even the errors returned by the compose function. Instead
> > of removing the `ret` variable, it should save the value and show the
> > exact error. This missing variable is causing a compilation issue also.
> > 
> 
> Oops, good catch! Hmm, I missed some intermediate patch for some commit.
> Let me check.

OK, I found this is a bug introduced when mergeing the patch.

This bug has been introduced by
[1] commit e5efaeb8a8f5 ("bootconfig: Support mixing a value and subkeys under a key")

However the original post of the patch (Linked from the above commit)

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/162262194685.264090.7738574774030567419.stgit@devnote2

seems correct, because 'ret' local variable exists in xbc_show_list().
However, this 'ret' has been removed in Apr, by 

[2] commit 30d103f2d460 ("tools/bootconfig: Simplify expression")

So I think it is merge timing issue... When I wrote [1], [2] was not
on my working tree (I forgot it, sorry). But when we merge [1], 
[2] was Steve's tree, and caused this issue.

Anyway, thank you for reporting!

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Fixes: e5efaeb8a8f5 ("bootconfig: Support mixing a value and subkeys under a key")
Cc: stable@vgar.kernel.org

Thank you!

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/bootconfig/main.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/bootconfig/main.c b/tools/bootconfig/main.c
> > index f45fa992e01d..fd67496a947f 100644
> > --- a/tools/bootconfig/main.c
> > +++ b/tools/bootconfig/main.c
> > @@ -111,9 +111,11 @@ static void xbc_show_list(void)
> >  	char key[XBC_KEYLEN_MAX];
> >  	struct xbc_node *leaf;
> >  	const char *val;
> > +	int ret;
> >  
> >  	xbc_for_each_key_value(leaf, val) {
> > -		if (xbc_node_compose_key(leaf, key, XBC_KEYLEN_MAX) < 0) {
> > +		ret = xbc_node_compose_key(leaf, key, XBC_KEYLEN_MAX);
> > +		if (ret < 0) {
> >  			fprintf(stderr, "Failed to compose key %d\n", ret);
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

      reply	other threads:[~2021-08-31  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-31  3:32 [PATCH] bootconfig: Fix missing return check of xbc_node_compose_key function Julio Faracco
2021-08-31  7:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-08-31  8:04   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210831170437.2edec726afc4731f481e7c5f@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=jcfaracco@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.