All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Klink <flokli@flokli.de>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: "Kumar, M Chetan" <m.chetan.kumar@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxwwan@intel.com
Subject: Re: wwan/iosm vs. xmm7360
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 20:01:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210907180144.c2jakttbigc5x7dm@tp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bafc04de-fb2c-03b4-69c1-ac91e9e8c7ae@siemens.com>

On 21-08-06 11:41:27, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>On 06.08.21 11:29, Kumar, M Chetan wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> What is the context of this request ?
>
>The context is that there are many folks out there (me included - Lenovo
>P52) with devices that have the xmm-7360 built-in, can't switch it to
>USB mode (prevented by OEM), and currently require [1]. That kind of
>works but is not really the final solution. So I also kicked off [2] there.

It also seems the 7560 card doesn't show up in my X13 AMD (Gen 1) at all
- so even if I'd "upgrade" that card, I couldn't use it.

>I know. I'm not an expert on the details, but reading the overall
>architectures of the IOSM and what has been reverse-engineered for the
>7360, there seem to be some similarities. So, maybe you can explain to
>the community if that is a reasonable path to upstream 7360 support, or
>if at least the pattern of the 7560 could/should be transferred to the
>7360 driver.

Very curious about this as well - they might share some code at lest, if
not even the driver?

Regards,
Florian

>
>Thanks,
>Jan
>
>[2] https://github.com/xmm7360/xmm7360-pci/issues/104
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chetan
>>
>> On 8/6/2021 2:09 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi Chetan,
>>>
>>> at the risk of having missed this being answered already:
>>>
>>> How close is the older xmm7360 to the now supported xmm7560 in mainline?
>>>
>>> There is that reverse engineered PCI driver [1] with non-standard
>>> userland interface, and it would obviously be great to benefit from
>>> common infrastructure and specifically the modem-manager compatible
>>> interface. Is this realistic to achieve for the 7360, or is that
>>> hardware or its firmware too different?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/xmm7360/xmm7360-pci
>>>
>
>-- 
>Siemens AG, T RDA IOT
>Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

-- 
Florian Klink

      reply	other threads:[~2021-09-07 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-05 20:39 wwan/iosm vs. xmm7360 Jan Kiszka
2021-08-06  9:29 ` Kumar, M Chetan
2021-08-06  9:41   ` Jan Kiszka
2021-09-07 18:01     ` Florian Klink [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210907180144.c2jakttbigc5x7dm@tp \
    --to=flokli@flokli.de \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxwwan@intel.com \
    --cc=m.chetan.kumar@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.