Re: Problem with init debugging under QEMU ARM

[Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4486 bytes --]

On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:29:17 +0200
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@majess.pl> wrote:

> Dear QEMU community,
> 
> I'm now trying to fix bug in glibc which became apparent on qemu
> 6.0.0.
> 
> The error is caused by glibc commit:
> bca0f5cbc9257c13322b99e55235c4f21ba0bd82
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blobdiff;f=sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h;h=eb13cb8b57496a0ec175c54a495f7e78db978fb7;hp=ff5e09e207f7986b1506b8895ae6c2aff032a380;hb=bca0f5cbc9257c13322b99e55235c4f21ba0bd82;hpb=34b4624b04fc8f038b2c329ca7560197320615b4
> 
> (reverting it causes the board to boot again)
> 
> Other components:
> binutils_2.37
> gcc_11.2
> Yocto poky: SHA1: 1e2e9a84d6dd81d7f6dd69c0d119d0149d10ade1
> 
> Qemu start line (the problem is visible on 5.2.0 and 6.0.0):
> qemu-system-arm -device
> virtio-net-device,netdev=net0,mac=52:54:00:12:34:02 -netdev
> tap,id=net0,ifnam e=tap0,script=no,downscript=no -object
> rng-random,filename=/dev/urandom,id=rng0 -device
> virtio-rng-pci,rng=rng0 -drive
> id=disk0,file=y2038-image-devel-qemuarm.ext4,if=none,format
> =raw -device virtio-blk-device,drive=disk0 -device qemu-xhci -device
> usb-tablet -device usb-kbd  -machine virt,highmem=off -cpu cortex-a15
> -smp 4 -m 256 -serial mon:stdio -serial null -nographic -device
> VGA,edid=on -kernel
> zImage--5.10.62+git0+bce2813b16_machine-r0-qemuarm-20210910095636.bin
> -append 'root=/dev/vda rw  mem=256M
> ip=192.168.7.2::192.168.7.1:255.255.255.0 console=ttyAMA0 console=hvc0
> vmalloc=256
> 
> 
> It has been tested with Cortex-A9 (Vexpress A9 2 core board) and
> Cortex-A15. I've also tested the v5.1, v5.10 and v5.14 kernels. The
> error is persistent.
> 
> I do add -s and -S when starting qemu-system-arm. I can use gdb to
> debug the kernel without issues. Unfortunately, I'm not able to debug
> /sbin/init after switching contex to user space.
> 
> Moreover, gdbserver cannot be used as the error (and kernel OOPs) is
> caused when early code from ld-linux.so.3 (the _dl_start function) is
> executed.
> 
> 
> Any hints on how to debug it?
> 
> Inspecting assembler is one (awkward) option (some results presented
> below). I can also inspect the VMA of the code just before starting
> the /sbin/init process.
> 
> Unfortunately, when I try to break on user space code it is not very
> helpful (as -S -s are supposed to be used with kernel).
> 
> 
> Some info with the eligible code (_dl_start function):
> ------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I think that the problem may be with having the negative value
> calculated.
> 
> The relevant snipet:
> 
>     116c:       bf00            nop
>     116e:       bf00            nop
>     1170:       bf00            nop
>     1172:       f8df 3508       ldr.w   r3, [pc, #1288] ; 167c
>     <_dl_start+0x520>
> 
>     1176:       f8df 1508       ldr.w   r1, [pc, #1288] ; 1680
>     <_dl_start+0x524>
> 
>     117a:       447b            add     r3, pc
>     117c:       4479            add     r1, pc
>     117e:       f8c3 1598       str.w   r1, [r3, #1432] ; 0x598
>     1182:       bf00            nop
>     1184:       bf00            nop
>     1186:       bf00            nop
>     1188:       bf00            nop
>     118a:       bf00            nop
>     118c:       bf00            nop
>     118e:       f8df 24f4       ldr.w   r2, [pc, #1268] ; 1684
>     <_dl_start+0x528> 1192:       f8d3 5598       ldr.w   r5, [r3,
>     #1432] ; 0x598 1196:       447a            add     r2, pc
>     1198:       442a            add     r2, r5
>     119a:       1a52            subs    r2, r2, r1
>     119c:       f8c3 25a0       str.w   r2, [r3, #1440] ; 0x5a0
>     11a0:       6813            ldr     r3, [r2, #0]
> 
> 
>     167c:       0002be92        .word   0x0002be92
>     1680:       ffffee80        .word   0xffffee80
> 
> The r1 gets the 0xffffee80 (negative offset) value. It is then added
> to pc and used to calculate r2.
> 
> For working code (aforementioned patch reverted) - there are NO such
> large values (like aforementioned 0xffffee80). The arithmetic is done
> on 
> 
>    1690:       00000020        .word   0x00000020
>    1694:       0002be7e        .word   0x0002be7e
> 
> which seems to work.
> 
> Maybe I'm missing some flag when I do start qemu-system-arm?
> 
> Thanks in advance for help and hints.
> 

Any help or feedback on this issue?

-- 
Best regards,

Łukasz Majewski

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]