All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jack Pham <jackp@codeaurora.org>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xhci: Improve detection of device initiated wake signal.
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:16:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210922011643.GD3515@jackp-linux.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311115353.2137560-3-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>

Hi Mathias,

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 01:53:51PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> A xHC USB 3 port might miss the first wake signal from a USB 3 device
> if the port LFPS reveiver isn't enabled fast enough after xHC resume.
> 
> xHC host will anyway be resumed by a PME# signal, but will go back to
> suspend if no port activity is seen.
> The device resends the U3 LFPS wake signal after a 100ms delay, but
> by then host is already suspended, starting all over from the
> beginning of this issue.
> 
> USB 3 specs say U3 wake LFPS signal is sent for max 10ms, then device
> needs to delay 100ms before resending the wake.
> 
> Don't suspend immediately if port activity isn't detected in resume.
> Instead add a retry. If there is no port activity then delay for 120ms,
> and re-check for port activity.

We have a use case with which this change is causing unnecessary delay.
Consider a USB2* device is attached and host is initiating the resume.
Since this is not a device initiated wakeup there wouldn't be any
pending event seen on the PORTSC registers, yet this adds an additional
120ms delay to re-check the PORTSC before returning and allowing the USB
core to perform resume signaling.

Is there a way to avoid this delay in that case?  Perhaps could we
distinguish whether we arrive here at xhci_resume() due to a
host-initiated resume vs. a device remote wakeup?

* I think it should be similar for attached USB3 devices as well, since
the host-initiated exit from U3 wouldn't happen until usb_port_resume().

Thanks,
Jack

> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> index bd27bd670104..48a68fcf2b36 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> @@ -1088,6 +1088,7 @@ int xhci_resume(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, bool hibernated)
>  	struct usb_hcd		*secondary_hcd;
>  	int			retval = 0;
>  	bool			comp_timer_running = false;
> +	bool			pending_portevent = false;
>  
>  	if (!hcd->state)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -1226,13 +1227,22 @@ int xhci_resume(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, bool hibernated)
>  
>   done:
>  	if (retval == 0) {
> -		/* Resume root hubs only when have pending events. */
> -		if (xhci_pending_portevent(xhci)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Resume roothubs only if there are pending events.
> +		 * USB 3 devices resend U3 LFPS wake after a 100ms delay if
> +		 * the first wake signalling failed, give it that chance.
> +		 */
> +		pending_portevent = xhci_pending_portevent(xhci);
> +		if (!pending_portevent) {
> +			msleep(120);
> +			pending_portevent = xhci_pending_portevent(xhci);
> +		}
> +
> +		if (pending_portevent) {
>  			usb_hcd_resume_root_hub(xhci->shared_hcd);
>  			usb_hcd_resume_root_hub(hcd);
>  		}
>  	}

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-22  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-11 11:53 [PATCH 0/4] xhci fixes for usb-linus Mathias Nyman
2021-03-11 11:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] usb: xhci: do not perform Soft Retry for some xHCI hosts Mathias Nyman
2021-03-11 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] xhci: Improve detection of device initiated wake signal Mathias Nyman
2021-09-22  1:16   ` Jack Pham [this message]
2021-09-22  6:49     ` Greg KH
2021-03-11 11:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] usb: xhci: Fix ASMedia ASM1042A and ASM3242 DMA addressing Mathias Nyman
2021-03-11 11:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] xhci: Fix repeated xhci wake after suspend due to uncleared internal wake state Mathias Nyman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210922011643.GD3515@jackp-linux.qualcomm.com \
    --to=jackp@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.