All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 08/12] xfs: Promote xfs_extnum_t and xfs_aextnum_t to 64 and 32-bits respectively
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:47:07 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210928004707.GO1756565@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210916100647.176018-9-chandan.babu@oracle.com>

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 03:36:43PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> A future commit will introduce a 64-bit on-disk data extent counter and a
> 32-bit on-disk attr extent counter. This commit promotes xfs_extnum_t and
> xfs_aextnum_t to 64 and 32-bits in order to correctly handle in-core versions
> of these quantities.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>

So while I was auditing extent lengths w.r.t. the last patch f the
series, I noticed that xfs_extnum_t is used in the struct
xfs_log_dinode and so changing the size of these types changes the
layout of this structure:

/*
 * Define the format of the inode core that is logged. This structure must be
 * kept identical to struct xfs_dinode except for the endianness annotations.
 */
struct xfs_log_dinode {
....
        xfs_rfsblock_t  di_nblocks;     /* # of direct & btree blocks used */
        xfs_extlen_t    di_extsize;     /* basic/minimum extent size for file */
        xfs_extnum_t    di_nextents;    /* number of extents in data fork */
        xfs_aextnum_t   di_anextents;   /* number of extents in attribute fork*/
....

Which means this:

> -typedef int32_t		xfs_extnum_t;	/* # of extents in a file */
> -typedef int16_t		xfs_aextnum_t;	/* # extents in an attribute fork */
> +typedef uint64_t	xfs_extnum_t;	/* # of extents in a file */
> +typedef uint32_t	xfs_aextnum_t;	/* # extents in an attribute fork */

creates an incompatible log format change that will cause silent
inode corruption during log recovery if inodes logged with this
change are replayed on an older kernel without this change. It's not
just the type size change that matters here - it also changes the
implicit padding in this structure because xfs_extlen_t is a 32 bit
object and so:

Old					New
64 bit object (di_nblocks)		64 bit object (di_nblocks)
32 bit object (di_extsize)		32 bit object (di_extsize)
					32 bit pad (implicit)
32 bit object (di_nextents)		64 bit object (di_nextents)
16 bit object (di_anextents)		32 bit ojecct (di_anextents
8 bit object (di_forkoff)		8 bit object (di_forkoff)
8 bit object (di_aformat)		8 bit object (di_aformat)
					16 bit pad (implicit)
32 bit object (di_dmevmask)		32 bit object (di_dmevmask)


That's quite the layout change, and that's something we must not do
without a feature bit being set. hence I think we need to rev the
struct xfs_log_dinode version for large extent count support, too,
so that the struct xfs_log_dinode does not change size for
filesystems without the large extent count feature.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-28  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-16 10:06 [PATCH V3 00/12] xfs: Extend per-inode extent counters Chandan Babu R
2021-09-16 10:06 ` [PATCH V3 01/12] xfs: Move extent count limits to xfs_format.h Chandan Babu R
2021-09-16 10:06 ` [PATCH V3 02/12] xfs: Introduce xfs_iext_max_nextents() helper Chandan Babu R
2021-09-16 10:06 ` [PATCH V3 03/12] xfs: Rename MAXEXTNUM, MAXAEXTNUM to XFS_IFORK_EXTCNT_MAXS32, XFS_IFORK_EXTCNT_MAXS16 Chandan Babu R
2021-09-16 10:06 ` [PATCH V3 04/12] xfs: Use xfs_extnum_t instead of basic data types Chandan Babu R
2021-09-16 10:06 ` [PATCH V3 05/12] xfs: Introduce xfs_dfork_nextents() helper Chandan Babu R
2021-09-27 22:46   ` Dave Chinner
2021-09-28  9:46     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-09-16 10:06 ` [PATCH V3 06/12] xfs: xfs_dfork_nextents: Return extent count via an out argument Chandan Babu R
2021-09-30  1:19   ` Dave Chinner
2021-09-16 10:06 ` [PATCH V3 07/12] xfs: Rename inode's extent counter fields based on their width Chandan Babu R
2021-09-27 23:46   ` Dave Chinner
2021-09-28  4:04     ` Dave Chinner
2021-09-29 17:03       ` Chandan Babu R
2021-09-30  0:40         ` Dave Chinner
2021-09-30  4:31           ` Dave Chinner
2021-09-30  7:30             ` Chandan Babu R
2021-09-30 22:55               ` Dave Chinner
2021-10-07 10:52                 ` Chandan Babu R
2021-10-10 21:49                   ` Dave Chinner
2021-10-13 14:44                     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-10-14  2:00                       ` Dave Chinner
2021-10-14 10:07                         ` Chandan Babu R
2021-10-21 10:27                       ` Chandan Babu R
2021-09-28  9:47     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-09-16 10:06 ` [PATCH V3 08/12] xfs: Promote xfs_extnum_t and xfs_aextnum_t to 64 and 32-bits respectively Chandan Babu R
2021-09-28  0:47   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2021-09-28  9:47     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-09-28 23:08       ` Dave Chinner
2021-09-29 17:04         ` Chandan Babu R
2021-09-16 10:06 ` [PATCH V3 09/12] xfs: Enable bulkstat ioctl to support 64-bit per-inode extent counters Chandan Babu R
2021-09-27 23:06   ` Dave Chinner
2021-09-28  9:49     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-09-28 23:39       ` Dave Chinner
2021-09-29 17:04         ` Chandan Babu R
2021-09-16 10:06 ` [PATCH V3 10/12] xfs: Extend per-inode extent counter widths Chandan Babu R
2021-09-16 10:06 ` [PATCH V3 11/12] xfs: Add XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NREXT64 to XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_ALL Chandan Babu R
2021-09-16 10:06 ` [PATCH V3 12/12] xfs: Define max extent length based on on-disk format definition Chandan Babu R
2021-09-28  0:33   ` Dave Chinner
2021-09-28 10:07     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-09-18  0:03 ` [PATCH V3 00/12] xfs: Extend per-inode extent counters Darrick J. Wong
2021-09-18  3:36   ` [External] : " Chandan Babu R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210928004707.GO1756565@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.