All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] rcu/nocb: Limit number of softirq callbacks only on softirq
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 02:08:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211019000816.455375-8-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211019000816.455375-1-frederic@kernel.org>

The current condition to limit the number of callbacks executed in a
row checks the offloaded state of the rdp. Not only is it volatile
but it is also misleading: the rcu_core() may well be executing
callbacks concurrently with NOCB kthreads, and the offloaded state
would then be verified on both cases. As a result the limit would
spuriously not apply anymore on softirq while in the middle of
(de-)offloading process.

Fix and clarify the condition with those constraints in mind:

_ If callbacks are processed either by rcuc or NOCB kthread, the call
  to cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() is enough to take care of the overload.

_ If instead callbacks are processed by softirqs:
  * If need_resched(), exit the callbacks processing
  * Otherwise if CPU is idle we can continue
  * Otherwise exit because a softirq shouldn't interrupt a task for too
    long nor deprive other pending softirq vectors of the CPU.

Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index eaa9c7ce91bb..716dead1509d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2535,9 +2535,8 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 		/*
 		 * Stop only if limit reached and CPU has something to do.
 		 */
-		if (count >= bl && !offloaded &&
-		    (need_resched() ||
-		     (!is_idle_task(current) && !rcu_is_callbacks_kthread())))
+		if (count >= bl && in_serving_softirq() &&
+		    (need_resched() || !is_idle_task(current)))
 			break;
 		if (unlikely(tlimit)) {
 			/* only call local_clock() every 32 callbacks */
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-19  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-19  0:08 [PATCH 00/10] rcu: Make rcu_core() safe in PREEMPT_RT with NOCB + a few other fixes v3 Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-19  0:08 ` [PATCH 01/10] rcu/nocb: Prepare state machine for a new step Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-19  0:08 ` [PATCH 02/10] rcu/nocb: Invoke rcu_core() at the start of deoffloading Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-19  0:08 ` [PATCH 03/10] rcu/nocb: Make rcu_core() callbacks acceleration preempt-safe Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-19  0:08 ` [PATCH 04/10] rcu/nocb: Make rcu_core() callbacks acceleration (de-)offloading safe Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-19  0:08 ` [PATCH 05/10] rcu/nocb: Check a stable offloaded state to manipulate qlen_last_fqs_check Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-19  0:08 ` [PATCH 06/10] rcu/nocb: Use appropriate rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave() Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-19  0:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2021-10-19  0:08 ` [PATCH 08/10] rcu: Fix callbacks processing time limit retaining cond_resched() Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-19  0:08 ` [PATCH 09/10] rcu: Apply callbacks processing time limit only on softirq Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-19  0:08 ` [PATCH 10/10] rcu/nocb: Don't invoke local rcu core on callback overload from nocb kthread Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-19  0:16 ` [PATCH 00/10] rcu: Make rcu_core() safe in PREEMPT_RT with NOCB + a few other fixes v3 Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211019000816.455375-8-frederic@kernel.org \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=Valentin.Schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.