All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
To: guoren@kernel.org
Cc: anup@brainfault.org, atish.patra@wdc.com, maz@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] irqchip/sifive-plic: Fixup EOI failed when masked
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:47:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211101164705.4e07fdb9@redslave.neermore.group> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211101131736.3800114-1-guoren@kernel.org>

On Mon,  1 Nov 2021 21:17:36 +0800
guoren@kernel.org wrote:

Hi Guo Ren,

Thank you for your patch.

May be it should be applied to stable ?

Tested-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>

> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the
> driver, only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq
> is blocked by hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq
> source which has been disabled in enable register. The bug was
> firstly reported in [1].
> 
> Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]:
> 
> The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by
> writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the
> claim/complete register. The PLIC does not check whether the
> completion ID is the same as the last claim ID for that target. If
> the completion ID does not match an interrupt source that is
> currently enabled for the target, the ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
> completion is silently ignored.
> 
> [1]
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html
> [2]
> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc
> 
> Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> Cc: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
> Cc: incent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes since V6:
>  - Propagate to plic_irq_eoi for all riscv,plic by Nikita Shubin
>  - Remove thead related codes
> 
> Changes since V5:
>  - Move back to mask/unmask
>  - Fixup the problem in eoi callback
>  - Remove allwinner,sun20i-d1 IRQCHIP_DECLARE
>  - Rewrite comment log
> 
> Changes since V4:
>  - Update comment by Anup
> 
> Changes since V3:
>  - Rename "c9xx" to "c900"
>  - Add sifive_plic_chip and thead_plic_chip for difference
> 
> Changes since V2:
>  - Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic"
>  - set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point
>    irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask
>  - Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the
>    differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx
>    PLIC.
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c index cf74cfa82045..259065d271ef
> 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,13 @@ static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
>  
> -	writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> +	if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) {
> +		plic_irq_unmask(d);
> +		writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> +		plic_irq_mask(d);
> +	} else {
> +		writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
To: guoren@kernel.org
Cc: anup@brainfault.org, atish.patra@wdc.com, maz@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] irqchip/sifive-plic: Fixup EOI failed when masked
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:47:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211101164705.4e07fdb9@redslave.neermore.group> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211101131736.3800114-1-guoren@kernel.org>

On Mon,  1 Nov 2021 21:17:36 +0800
guoren@kernel.org wrote:

Hi Guo Ren,

Thank you for your patch.

May be it should be applied to stable ?

Tested-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>

> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the
> driver, only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq
> is blocked by hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq
> source which has been disabled in enable register. The bug was
> firstly reported in [1].
> 
> Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]:
> 
> The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by
> writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the
> claim/complete register. The PLIC does not check whether the
> completion ID is the same as the last claim ID for that target. If
> the completion ID does not match an interrupt source that is
> currently enabled for the target, the ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
> completion is silently ignored.
> 
> [1]
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html
> [2]
> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc
> 
> Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> Cc: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
> Cc: incent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes since V6:
>  - Propagate to plic_irq_eoi for all riscv,plic by Nikita Shubin
>  - Remove thead related codes
> 
> Changes since V5:
>  - Move back to mask/unmask
>  - Fixup the problem in eoi callback
>  - Remove allwinner,sun20i-d1 IRQCHIP_DECLARE
>  - Rewrite comment log
> 
> Changes since V4:
>  - Update comment by Anup
> 
> Changes since V3:
>  - Rename "c9xx" to "c900"
>  - Add sifive_plic_chip and thead_plic_chip for difference
> 
> Changes since V2:
>  - Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic"
>  - set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point
>    irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask
>  - Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the
>    differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx
>    PLIC.
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c index cf74cfa82045..259065d271ef
> 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,13 @@ static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
>  
> -	writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> +	if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) {
> +		plic_irq_unmask(d);
> +		writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> +		plic_irq_mask(d);
> +	} else {
> +		writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-01 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-01 13:17 [PATCH V6] irqchip/sifive-plic: Fixup EOI failed when masked guoren
2021-11-01 13:17 ` guoren
2021-11-01 13:47 ` Nikita Shubin [this message]
2021-11-01 13:47   ` Nikita Shubin
2021-11-02  1:34   ` Guo Ren
2021-11-02  1:34     ` Guo Ren
2021-11-04 14:40 ` Anup Patel
2021-11-04 14:40   ` Anup Patel
2021-11-04 14:57   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-04 14:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-05  1:06     ` Guo Ren
2021-11-05  1:06       ` Guo Ren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211101164705.4e07fdb9@redslave.neermore.group \
    --to=nikita.shubin@maquefel.me \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=plr.vincent@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.