From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>,
Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>,
Asaf Kahlon <asafka7@gmail.com>,
buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] package/python-cryptography: add host-python3-six host dependency
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 21:19:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211104211951.522e6d38@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211103201932.296897-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 14:19:32 -0600
James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> wrote:
> This dependency wasn't added during the removal of
> python3-cryptography.
>
> The conversion/dropping of python3-cryptography was done with commits
> [1] and [2], and the commit log of [1] states the dropping of the
> host-python3-six dependency was intentionally:
>
> [...]
> While at it, drop host-python3-pip and host-python3-six as these
> dependencies are not needed. Indeed, pip was never a dependency of
> cryptography and six is not a dependency with python3 and will be
> dropped in version 3.4 and
> https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/e66db8079d3fbd0110e87ece1fd48f4bfd9e48b9
> [...]
>
> But the package python-cryptography is still at version 3.3.2 (and
> clearly depends on six)
>
> [1] https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=95a63a34ac9204c4fe069154783bd97ed48c3ae2
> [2] https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=43147827a7b759248288fad1d97130c027c23e9a
>
> Fixes:
> - http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/971/9711ccebb9c3e2fa8f17d969d8b431d4301677e3/build-end.log
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
> Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> - add explanation for six being required still
> ---
> package/python-cryptography/python-cryptography.mk | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to master, thanks. I am curious to hear why the target version
of python-cryptography does not need python-six. Is it because our
target Python interpreter is recent enough that it implements all what
python-cryptography needs, without python-six as a "compatibility"
layer?
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-04 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-03 20:19 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] package/python-cryptography: add host-python3-six host dependency James Hilliard
2021-11-04 20:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211104211951.522e6d38@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=asafka7@gmail.com \
--cc=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com \
--cc=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
--cc=ps.report@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.