From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, jasowang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Timing out virtio-pci config space access
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 17:59:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211105122943.GA18377@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211105033354-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
* Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> [2021-11-05 03:38:39]:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:37:40PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > We are working on a virtio-pci implementation on a Type-1 hypervisor where
> > backend drivers are hosted in another VM and are considered untrusted. PCI is
> > the virtio transport used in this case.
> >
> > One issue that crops up is a read/write of config space can potentially block
> > forever, as the backend is untrusted and could be causing a denial-of-service of
> > sorts. This causes the vcpu to stall forever. I was wondering if we can timeout
> > in such case and have the hypervisor break the stall by letting read return
> > "error" (-1) along with setting DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET in status register. Will that
> > allow Linux guest driver to gracefully fail its probe? I don't see where Linux
> > handles DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET currently and also am not sure if returning -1 will
> > lead to graceful failure of the driver alone (we don't want VM to come down or
> > panic because of a mis-behaving device).
>
> DEVICE_NEEDS_RESET isn't handled ATM. the point of it in any case
> is a recoverable error, with a malicious backend this is
> not the case.
>
>
> Once thing you can do that will work a bit better is implementing
> surprise-removal in this case.
My layman understanding of surprise removal is that it requires the PCI
controller to interrupt OS and convey which device is removed, so that the PCI
subsystem can mark it "removed"? Is that possible for the generic controller
("pci-host-ecam-generic") that virtio pci devices use?
> So hypervisor detects a timeout
> (presumably it knows what to expect of the device) and then pretends to
> guest device is gone, unmapping it completely from guest.
Can you elaborate on what unmapping means? I think the reads should
return -1 and writes to be dropped in such case - beyond that what would unmap
entail?
Thanks
vatsa
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-05 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-04 17:07 [virtio-dev] Timing out virtio-pci config space access Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-11-05 4:52 ` [virtio-dev] " Jason Wang
2021-11-05 12:42 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2021-11-05 7:38 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-05 12:29 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2021-11-05 13:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-05 14:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211105122943.GA18377@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.