From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] find: Do not read beyond variable boundaries on small sizes
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 10:26:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211203182638.GA450223@lapt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YaoN6wnNezMvyyd5@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 02:30:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 02:08:46AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > It's common practice to cast small variable arguments to the find_*_bit()
Not that common - I found 19 examples of this cast, and most of them
are in drivers. The only non-driver case is kernel/trace/pid_list.c:
static inline bool upper_empty(union upper_chunk *chunk)
{
/*
* If chunk->data has no lower chunks, it will be the same
* as a zeroed bitmask. Use find_first_bit() to test it
* and if it doesn't find any bits set, then the array
* is empty.
*/
int bit = find_first_bit((unsigned long *)chunk->data,
sizeof(chunk->data) * 8);
return bit >= sizeof(chunk->data) * 8;
}
And it's OK wrt type conversion because chunk->data is:
union lower_chunk {
union lower_chunk *next;
unsigned long data[LOWER_SIZE]; // 2K in size
};
Although, this function should use bitmap_empty(), probably like this:
static inline bool upper_empty(union upper_chunk *chunk)
{
return bitmap_empty(chunk->data->data[0], BITS_PER_LONG);
}
Steven, can you comment on this?
> It's a bad practice and should be fixed accordingly, no?
Yes.
> > helpers to unsigned long and then use a size argument smaller than
> > sizeof(unsigned long):
> >
> > unsigned int bits;
> > ...
> > out = find_first_bit((unsigned long *)&bits, 32);
> >
> > This leads to the find helper dereferencing a full unsigned long,
> > regardless of the size of the actual variable. The unwanted bits
> > get masked away, but strictly speaking, a read beyond the end of
> > the target variable happens. Builds under -Warray-bounds complain
> > about this situation, for example:
> >
> > In file included from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:9,
> > from drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c:17:
> > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c: In function 'domain_context_mapping_one':
> > ./include/linux/find.h:119:37: error: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'int[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
> > 119 | unsigned long val = *addr & GENMASK(size - 1, 0);
> > | ^~~~~
> > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c:2115:18: note: while referencing 'max_pde'
> > 2115 | int pds, max_pde;
> > | ^~~~~~~
The driver should be fixed. I would suggest using one of ffs/fls/ffz from
include/asm/bitops.h
Thanks,
Yury
> > Instead, just carefully read the correct variable size, all of which
> > happens at compile time since small_const_nbits(size) has already
> > determined that arguments are constant expressions.
>
> What is the performance impact?
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-03 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 10:08 [PATCH] find: Do not read beyond variable boundaries on small sizes Kees Cook
2021-12-03 12:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-03 16:37 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-03 19:16 ` Yury Norov
2021-12-03 22:43 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-03 18:26 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2021-12-03 20:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-12-03 23:01 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-07 23:39 ` Yury Norov
2021-12-08 5:25 ` Yury Norov
2021-12-08 10:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-08 13:07 ` David Laight
2021-12-08 19:19 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-08 19:34 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-08 23:23 ` Rasmus Villemoes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211203182638.GA450223@lapt \
--to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.