All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
To: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH linux dev-5.15 1/7] tpm_tis: Fix expected bit handling
Date: Wed,  8 Dec 2021 13:17:52 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211208191758.20517-2-eajames@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211208191758.20517-1-eajames@linux.ibm.com>

From: Amir Mizinski <amirmizi6@gmail.com>

Currently, the driver polls the TPM_STS.stsValid field until TRUE; then it
reads TPM_STS register again to verify only that TPM_STS.expect field is
FALSE (i.e., it ignores TPM_STS.stsValid).
Since TPM_STS.stsValid represents the TPM_STS.expect validity, a check of
only one of these fields is wrong. Fix this condition so that both fields
are checked in the same TPM_STS register read.

Modify the signature of wait_for_tpm_stat() to tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(),
adding an additional "expected" parameter to its call.
tpm_tis_wait_for_stat() is now polling the TPM_STS with a mask and waits
for the value in "expected". This modification adds the ability to check if
certain TPM_STS bits have been cleared.
For example, use the new parameter to check in status that TPM_STS_VALID
is set and also that TPM_STS_EXPECT is zeroed. This prevents a racy
check.

Suggested-by: Benoit Houyere <benoit.houyere@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Amir Mizinski <amirmizi6@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 61 +++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index b2659a4c4016..adb086b6df7c 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ static bool wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
 	return false;
 }
 
-static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
-		unsigned long timeout, wait_queue_head_t *queue,
-		bool check_cancel)
+static int tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, u8 expected,
+				 unsigned long timeout,
+				 wait_queue_head_t *queue, bool check_cancel)
 {
 	struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
 	unsigned long stop;
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
 
 	/* check current status */
 	status = chip->ops->status(chip);
-	if ((status & mask) == mask)
+	if ((status & mask) == expected)
 		return 0;
 
 	stop = jiffies + timeout;
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
 			usleep_range(priv->timeout_min,
 				     priv->timeout_max);
 			status = chip->ops->status(chip);
-			if ((status & mask) == mask)
+			if ((status & mask) == expected)
 				return 0;
 		} while (time_before(jiffies, stop));
 	}
@@ -260,10 +260,11 @@ static int recv_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
 	int size = 0, burstcnt, rc;
 
 	while (size < count) {
-		rc = wait_for_tpm_stat(chip,
-				 TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
-				 chip->timeout_c,
-				 &priv->read_queue, true);
+		rc = tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(chip,
+					   TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
+					   TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
+					   chip->timeout_c, &priv->read_queue,
+					   true);
 		if (rc < 0)
 			return rc;
 		burstcnt = get_burstcount(chip);
@@ -316,8 +317,9 @@ static int tpm_tis_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, chip->timeout_c,
-				&priv->int_queue, false) < 0) {
+	if (tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, TPM_STS_VALID,
+				  chip->timeout_c, &priv->int_queue,
+				  false) < 0) {
 		size = -ETIME;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -343,14 +345,14 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
 	struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
 	int rc, status, burstcnt;
 	size_t count = 0;
-	bool itpm = priv->flags & TPM_TIS_ITPM_WORKAROUND;
 
 	status = tpm_tis_status(chip);
 	if ((status & TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY) == 0) {
 		tpm_tis_ready(chip);
-		if (wait_for_tpm_stat
-		    (chip, TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY, chip->timeout_b,
-		     &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) {
+		if (tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(chip, TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY,
+					  TPM_STS_COMMAND_READY,
+					  chip->timeout_b, &priv->int_queue,
+					  false) < 0) {
 			rc = -ETIME;
 			goto out_err;
 		}
@@ -370,34 +372,24 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
 			goto out_err;
 
 		count += burstcnt;
-
-		if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, chip->timeout_c,
-					&priv->int_queue, false) < 0) {
+		if (tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID | TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT,
+					  TPM_STS_VALID | TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT, chip->timeout_a,
+					  &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) {
 			rc = -ETIME;
 			goto out_err;
 		}
-		status = tpm_tis_status(chip);
-		if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) == 0) {
-			rc = -EIO;
-			goto out_err;
-		}
 	}
 
 	/* write last byte */
 	rc = tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_DATA_FIFO(priv->locality), buf[count]);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		goto out_err;
-
-	if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, chip->timeout_c,
-				&priv->int_queue, false) < 0) {
+	if (tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID | TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT,
+				  TPM_STS_VALID, chip->timeout_a,
+				  &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) {
 		rc = -ETIME;
 		goto out_err;
 	}
-	status = tpm_tis_status(chip);
-	if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) != 0) {
-		rc = -EIO;
-		goto out_err;
-	}
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -452,9 +444,10 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
 		ordinal = be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (buf + 6)));
 
 		dur = tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
-		if (wait_for_tpm_stat
-		    (chip, TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, dur,
-		     &priv->read_queue, false) < 0) {
+		if (tpm_tis_wait_for_stat(chip,
+					  TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
+					  TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
+					  dur, &priv->read_queue, false) < 0) {
 			rc = -ETIME;
 			goto out_err;
 		}
-- 
2.27.0


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-08 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-08 19:17 [PATCH linux dev-5.15 0/7] Add tpm i2c ptp driver Eddie James
2021-12-08 19:17 ` Eddie James [this message]
2021-12-08 19:17 ` [PATCH linux dev-5.15 2/7] tpm: tpm_tis: Rewrite "tpm_tis_req_canceled()" Eddie James
2021-12-08 19:17 ` [PATCH linux dev-5.15 3/7] tpm: tpm_tis: Verify TPM_STS register is valid after locality request Eddie James
2021-12-08 19:17 ` [PATCH linux dev-5.15 4/7] tpm: tpm_tis: Add tpm_tis_i2c driver Eddie James
2021-12-08 19:17 ` [PATCH linux dev-5.15 5/7] tpm: Add YAML schema for TPM TIS I2C options Eddie James
2021-12-08 19:17 ` [PATCH linux dev-5.15 6/7] ARM: dts: aspeed: Rainier: Add TPM device Eddie James
2021-12-08 19:17 ` [PATCH linux dev-5.15 7/7] ARM: dts: aspeed: Everest: " Eddie James

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211208191758.20517-2-eajames@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=eajames@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.