From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Aharon Landau <aharonl@nvidia.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 2/7] RDMA/mlx5: Replace cache list with Xarray
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 13:56:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211209175616.GV6385@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c1d9ad2-0619-16cb-4be3-c763668639de@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:21:22AM +0200, Aharon Landau wrote:
> > It feels like pending and (reserved - stored) are really the same
> > thing, so maybe just directly limit the number of reserved and test it
> > after
> The mlx5_ib_dereg_mr is reserving entries as well. Should I limit
> create_mkey_cb due to pending deregs?
Sure, it is the same concept, deregs are going to refill things just
as wass as new creations.
> > > @@ -287,39 +318,37 @@ static void remove_cache_mr_locked(struct mlx5_cache_ent *ent)
> > > {
> > > struct mlx5_ib_mr *mr;
> > > - lockdep_assert_held(&ent->lock);
> > > - if (list_empty(&ent->head))
> > > + if (!ent->stored)
> > > return;
> > > - mr = list_first_entry(&ent->head, struct mlx5_ib_mr, list);
> > > - list_del(&mr->list);
> > > - ent->available_mrs--;
> > > + mr = __xa_store(&ent->mkeys, --ent->stored, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + WARN_ON(mr == NULL || xa_is_err(mr));
> > Add a if (reserved != stored) before the below?
> I initiated the xarray using XA_FLAGS_ALLOC, therefore, the __xa_store above
> will mark the entry as ZERO_ENTRY.
Oh, do not use XA_FLAGS_ALLOC, this is not what is it for
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-09 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-06 9:10 [PATCH rdma-next 0/7] MR cache enhancement Leon Romanovsky
2021-12-06 9:10 ` [PATCH rdma-next 1/7] RDMA/mlx5: Merge similar flows of allocating MR from the cache Leon Romanovsky
2021-12-06 9:10 ` [PATCH rdma-next 2/7] RDMA/mlx5: Replace cache list with Xarray Leon Romanovsky
2021-12-08 16:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-12-09 8:03 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-12-09 8:21 ` Aharon Landau
2021-12-09 17:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-12-06 9:10 ` [PATCH rdma-next 3/7] RDMA/mlx5: Store in the cache mkeys instead of mrs Leon Romanovsky
2021-12-08 20:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-12-06 9:10 ` [PATCH rdma-next 4/7] RDMA/mlx5: Change the cache structure to an RB-tree Leon Romanovsky
2021-12-08 20:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-12-06 9:10 ` [PATCH rdma-next 5/7] RDMA/mlx5: Reorder calls to pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled() Leon Romanovsky
2021-12-06 9:10 ` [PATCH rdma-next 6/7] RDMA/mlx5: Delay the deregistration of a non-cache mkey Leon Romanovsky
2021-12-06 9:10 ` [PATCH rdma-next 7/7] RDMA/mlx5: Rename the mkey cache variables and functions Leon Romanovsky
2021-12-09 8:40 ` [PATCH rdma-next 0/7] MR cache enhancement Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211209175616.GV6385@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=aharonl@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.