From: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org (open list:BLOCK LAYER)
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/1] blktrace: switch trace spinlock to a raw spinlock
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 16:28:27 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211220192827.38297-1-wander@redhat.com> (raw)
The running_trace_lock protects running_trace_list and is acquired
within the tracepoint which implies disabled preemption. The spinlock_t
typed lock can not be acquired with disabled preemption on PREEMPT_RT
because it becomes a sleeping lock.
The runtime of the tracepoint depends on the number of entries in
running_trace_list and has no limit. The blk-tracer is considered debug
code and higher latencies here are okay.
Make running_trace_lock a raw_spinlock_t.
Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
---
kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
index 1183c88634aa..a86e022f7155 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static struct trace_array *blk_tr;
static bool blk_tracer_enabled __read_mostly;
static LIST_HEAD(running_trace_list);
-static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(running_trace_lock);
+static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(running_trace_lock);
/* Select an alternative, minimalistic output than the original one */
#define TRACE_BLK_OPT_CLASSIC 0x1
@@ -121,12 +121,12 @@ static void trace_note_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk)
struct blk_trace *bt;
tsk->btrace_seq = blktrace_seq;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&running_trace_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&running_trace_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(bt, &running_trace_list, running_list) {
trace_note(bt, tsk->pid, BLK_TN_PROCESS, tsk->comm,
sizeof(tsk->comm), 0);
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&running_trace_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&running_trace_lock, flags);
}
static void trace_note_time(struct blk_trace *bt)
@@ -666,9 +666,9 @@ static int __blk_trace_startstop(struct request_queue *q, int start)
blktrace_seq++;
smp_mb();
bt->trace_state = Blktrace_running;
- spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
list_add(&bt->running_list, &running_trace_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
trace_note_time(bt);
ret = 0;
@@ -676,9 +676,9 @@ static int __blk_trace_startstop(struct request_queue *q, int start)
} else {
if (bt->trace_state == Blktrace_running) {
bt->trace_state = Blktrace_stopped;
- spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
list_del_init(&bt->running_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
relay_flush(bt->rchan);
ret = 0;
}
@@ -1608,9 +1608,9 @@ static int blk_trace_remove_queue(struct request_queue *q)
if (bt->trace_state == Blktrace_running) {
bt->trace_state = Blktrace_stopped;
- spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
list_del_init(&bt->running_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&running_trace_lock);
relay_flush(bt->rchan);
}
--
2.27.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-12-20 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-20 19:28 Wander Lairson Costa [this message]
2021-12-20 19:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] blktrace: switch trace spinlock to a raw spinlock Jens Axboe
2021-12-20 19:49 ` Wander Costa
2021-12-20 20:24 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-20 20:34 ` Wander Costa
2021-12-20 20:37 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-20 20:43 ` Wander Costa
2021-12-20 20:49 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-20 23:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-12-20 23:45 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-20 20:50 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211220192827.38297-1-wander@redhat.com \
--to=wander@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.