From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF874C433F5 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234747AbhLUHM0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 02:12:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58072 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234622AbhLUHMZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 02:12:25 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9638EC061574 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:12:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id o63-20020a17090a0a4500b001b1c2db8145so1645511pjo.5 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:12:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Pd57JPrq9wLZuPMxLEz3oLDEgN+l/LTIJFa/r5cmmFU=; b=cAsgRiosMdXwEBHecB9MTUOyJ7JlmAzz4yCKMtYZw0aSo0OvF42q12VSuYiGkvc5xz erIQviIa5baFD9QVUATp9X7E3FHM1MZAFDhkZ/BYcpDewq48MJXFYfe3x1grgPIwy5GR cK+h5Far/XTLBoNKbGUUbsd0CvXhxB+et1q5eXqMSfvzLrOgfChgqFZmYpATDZjD/T2e +HJdixKurMFUuU3NpDo6wvU6jmklZL0wqMjCfB2sJfe43CFeW9P+qKjtr/o4xAdv+ULW jQL/zY3WAU6bYWYbEMGcFdXgtGSqB7kYWs2tifJhP+ExS8h3TuTqk4zhZiReMU4PQn2+ m4Sw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Pd57JPrq9wLZuPMxLEz3oLDEgN+l/LTIJFa/r5cmmFU=; b=jokzSuDYu1ujoWQBKn6T38EWgPX+brc+bMBRbmEn3QDmaW8kYWRHuVjMKbZeTF1cl2 hlEXiu+PvswqN4ZdtmItx4NBFsQoJetTK7XRL9U+TKnlsWlmQeW3C6ygvVHu76Lgz4f5 /KCmJWHK35T27XjgSJ1usq7eN82Hs8/p9rDimYlhKvGU37t7QmhtI+ZSKyX3rcLzip6V g+uHaHy3vUC3GyC4zE6S0akMoaE070h9QJ/FEwZNP4ZTCWphAuoUqNI5RkEzpMBbgtR1 IBFA3E86c1wmK6JI+dUIJEI89GORZZmgVr8iUBUw8DcKfNkf9R1+5R+gpT+lZWnxYsGC JKtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dkn9JLm5s1AW5rX3e8NgxufOqK0BDHfTj51ryS27yNyf1jjMG C8XFt1NdJsc3cYt8sVGEtUYr X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybKrTGTOw0sgXIk5MIpSXv/WBkmVaI8tHNqNxfUyfz+MejcF4YzSJI7jlVYqN8df1pRwCz6w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8693:b0:148:a2e7:fb5a with SMTP id g19-20020a170902869300b00148a2e7fb5amr2038733plo.155.1640070745085; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:12:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from thinkpad ([117.193.215.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ls7sm1568772pjb.11.2021.12.20.23.12.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:12:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:42:19 +0530 From: Manivannan Sadhasivam To: 20210106125322.61840-14-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org Cc: Rob Herring , Vinod Koul , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org Subject: Re: Question about node naming in [PATCH v3 13/18] ARM: dts: qcom: sdx55: Add spmi node Message-ID: <20211221071219.GD26872@thinkpad> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 09:27:17PM +0100, David Heidelberg wrote: > Hello Manivannan, > > I'd like to ask, if you had any particular reason to name node `qcom,spmi@` > instead of basic `spmi@`. > "spmi" node label was not documented by devicetree spec at that time. So I was using "qcom,spmi" but it was not correct either. I've submitted a PR now to devicetree-spec repo [1] for listing it as the generic node name. So once it got accepted, we can use "spmi@" for the node name. Thanks, Mani [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/pull/50 > I'm currently converting binding for > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb and I'm > considering adding qcom,spmi into qcom,spmi-pmic-arb or just rename this and > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi `qcom,spmi@` occurences to `spmi@`. > > Ideas, inputs? > > Thank you > David > >