From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22424C433EF for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 17:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8232440868; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 17:28:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lI9ZCfb42-AZ; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 17:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED34403CA; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 17:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA38B1BF399 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 17:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E022E60D64 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 17:28:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ZvLq_dLxCHh for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 17:28:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::14]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF14860C15 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 17:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ymorin.is-a-geek.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:cb19:8b51:cb00:b440:9a6c:7abd:86f8]) (Authenticated sender: yann.morin.1998@free.fr) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FE565FFAC; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 18:28:33 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1640971721; bh=wyxjqrMeFHL2F7NpyrPnnAlcJYK/nz+Jq0bRecOuPfM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OSbPcbQGLNgLYCOZNAqqkXy6Qc3CM9dyGQtKBTM7yRhIBP57DZuatdf5OKmG+1hE9 1nMQ7JE4Z50ULPetdwE93RekRbcRc9ZvVQT/SM6KrBFiTWLs1xJABDvxDZXy/4sjCW uestipxpJJLP5/pPH6aLD0Z8kOrS8YtZlADhf4KDFsExF84KBfeTE+ibQe2pKVoWc3 fF8Tv3ok078jnWjgiiw1mvRc4tOhwU8d35ljH8SqATxxjg9hsG4/wPGVUJKFsf7iz9 a66JXZfosqT64zUY5X5S9ERn3MahNRubhubFhuyJWm+q/EKfFPWrgASoySTuiIQ0rx TnfulxeYNMniw== Received: by ymorin.is-a-geek.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 31 Dec 2021 18:28:32 +0100 Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 18:28:32 +0100 From: "Yann E. MORIN" To: Thomas Petazzoni Message-ID: <20211231172832.GL3390456@scaer> References: <04d568a84678569e4aed9a17d0609009271e146f.1636810092.git.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <20211230214505.6bff001f@windsurf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211230214505.6bff001f@windsurf> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 13/16 v2] core/show-info: report whether a package is overriden X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Vadim Kochan , eeppeliteloop@gmail.com, buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Thomas, All, On 2021-12-30 21:45 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Sat, 13 Nov 2021 14:28:24 +0100 > "Yann E. MORIN" wrote: > > The show-info output can be used in quite some ways, like to assess the > > validity of the current configuration, like a production build in a CI > > would do for example. One such assessment would be to ensure that no > > package is overriden. [--SNIP--] > I did not apply this one, because when you set _SITE_METHOD = > local, then _OVERRIDE_SRCDIR will be assigned, but the package > isn't really "overridden". It's using locally available source code, as > part of the package definition itself. > > So I found that advertising this package as "overridden" was not > semantically correct. Indeed, I'll see if we can easily discriminate the two, to really report overriden non-local packages. Regards, Yann E. MORIN. > I'm of course ready to discuss this, and see other arguments :) > > Best regards, > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training > https://bootlin.com > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot@buildroot.org > https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot