From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/4] tst_atomic: add atomic_add_return for x86/64, ppc/64 and s390/x
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:08:44 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2021746918.1819347.1460722124804.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160414143622.GC22998@rei.suse.cz>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Thursday, 14 April, 2016 4:36:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/4] tst_atomic: add atomic_add_return for x86/64, ppc/64 and s390/x
>
> Hi!
> > #if HAVE_SYNC_ADD_AND_FETCH == 1
> > +#define HAVE_ATOMIC_ADD_RETURN 1
> > static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) int atomic_add_return(int i,
> > int *v)
> > {
> > return __sync_add_and_fetch(v, i);
> > }
> > -#else
> > +
> > +#else /* HAVE_SYNC_ADD_AND_FETCH == 1 */
> > +
> > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> > +#define HAVE_ATOMIC_ADD_RETURN 1
> > +static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) int atomic_add_return(int i,
> > int *v)
> > +{
>
> Maybe we can make the ifdefs a bit more readable by indenting them with
> spaces after the hash.
>
> #else
> # if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> # define HAVE_ATOMIC_ADD_RETURN 1
>
> ...
>
> # endif
I have re-arranged this in v3, so that there is less nesting,
and also dropped HAVE_ATOMIC_ADD_RETURN.
I also made some other small tweaks, changes are described
in each patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-15 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-14 8:59 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/4] tst_atomic: make tst_atomic_inc take a signed integer Jan Stancek
2016-04-14 8:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/4] m4: add a check for __sync_add_and_fetch Jan Stancek
2016-04-14 14:33 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-14 8:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/4] tst_atomic: add atomic_add_return for x86/64, ppc/64 and s390/x Jan Stancek
2016-04-14 14:36 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-15 12:08 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2016-04-14 8:59 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 4/4] tst_atomic: add test for tst_atomic_inc Jan Stancek
2016-04-14 14:43 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-14 14:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/4] tst_atomic: make tst_atomic_inc take a signed integer Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2021746918.1819347.1460722124804.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.