All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 12/13] selftest/bpf: Add raw kprobe attach test
Date: Tue,  4 Jan 2022 09:09:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220104080943.113249-13-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220104080943.113249-1-jolsa@kernel.org>

Adding raw kprobe attach test that uses new interface
to attach multiple kprobes with new kprobe link.

The test is attaching to bpf_fentry_test* functions and
single trampoline program to use bpf_prog_test_run to
trigger bpf_fentry_test* functions.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/raw_kprobe_test.c          | 92 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_kprobe.c  | 58 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_kprobe_test.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_kprobe.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_kprobe_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_kprobe_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5ade44c57c9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_kprobe_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "raw_kprobe.skel.h"
+#include "trace_helpers.h"
+
+static void test_skel_api(void)
+{
+	struct raw_kprobe *skel = NULL;
+	__u32 duration = 0, retval;
+	int err, prog_fd;
+
+	skel = raw_kprobe__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "raw_kprobe__open_and_load"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	err = raw_kprobe__attach(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "raw_kprobe__attach"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test1);
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, 1, NULL, 0,
+				NULL, NULL, &retval, &duration);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+	ASSERT_EQ(retval, 0, "test_run");
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test2_result, 8, "test2_result");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test3_result, 8, "test3_result");
+
+cleanup:
+	raw_kprobe__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_link_api(void)
+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, opts);
+	int err, prog_fd, link1_fd = -1, link2_fd = -1;
+	struct raw_kprobe *skel = NULL;
+	__u32 duration = 0, retval;
+	__u64 addrs[8];
+
+	skel = raw_kprobe__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "fentry_raw_skel_load"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	kallsyms_find("bpf_fentry_test1", &addrs[0]);
+	kallsyms_find("bpf_fentry_test2", &addrs[1]);
+	kallsyms_find("bpf_fentry_test3", &addrs[2]);
+	kallsyms_find("bpf_fentry_test4", &addrs[3]);
+	kallsyms_find("bpf_fentry_test5", &addrs[4]);
+	kallsyms_find("bpf_fentry_test6", &addrs[5]);
+	kallsyms_find("bpf_fentry_test7", &addrs[6]);
+	kallsyms_find("bpf_fentry_test8", &addrs[7]);
+
+	opts.kprobe.addrs = (__u64) addrs;
+	opts.kprobe.cnt = 8;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test2);
+	link1_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, BPF_TRACE_RAW_KPROBE, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(link1_fd, 0, "link_fd"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	opts.flags = BPF_F_KPROBE_RETURN;
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test3);
+	link2_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, BPF_TRACE_RAW_KPROBE, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(link2_fd, 0, "link_fd"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	skel->bss->test2_result = 0;
+	skel->bss->test3_result = 0;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test1);
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, 1, NULL, 0,
+				NULL, NULL, &retval, &duration);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+	ASSERT_EQ(retval, 0, "test_run");
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test2_result, 8, "test2_result");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test3_result, 8, "test3_result");
+
+cleanup:
+	if (link1_fd != -1)
+		close(link1_fd);
+	if (link2_fd != -1)
+		close(link2_fd);
+	raw_kprobe__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_raw_kprobe_test(void)
+{
+	test_skel_api();
+	test_link_api();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_kprobe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_kprobe.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..baf7086203f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/raw_kprobe.c
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test1 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test2 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test3 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test4 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test5 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test6 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test7 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test8 __ksym;
+
+/* No tests, just to trigger bpf_fentry_test* through tracing test_run */
+SEC("fentry/bpf_modify_return_test")
+int BPF_PROG(test1)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test2_result = 0;
+
+SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test*")
+int test2(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+	__u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
+
+	test2_result += (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test1 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test2 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test3 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test4 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test5 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test6 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test7 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test8;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test3_result = 0;
+
+SEC("kretprobe/bpf_fentry_test*")
+int test3(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+	__u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
+
+	test3_result += (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test1 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test2 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test3 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test4 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test5 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test6 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test7 ||
+			(const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test8;
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.33.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-04  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-04  8:09 [RFC 00/13] kprobe/bpf: Add support to attach multiple kprobes Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 01/13] ftrace: Add ftrace_set_filter_ips function Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] kprobe: Keep traced function address Jiri Olsa
2022-01-05 14:32   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-06  8:30     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-06  4:30   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-01-06  8:31     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] kprobe: Add support to register multiple ftrace kprobes Jiri Olsa
2022-01-05 15:00   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] kprobe: Add support to register multiple ftrace kretprobes Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] kprobe: Allow to get traced function address for multi ftrace kprobes Jiri Olsa
2022-01-06  4:30   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-01-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] samples/kprobes: Add support for multi kprobe interface Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] samples/kprobes: Add support for multi kretprobe interface Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] bpf: Add kprobe link for attaching raw kprobes Jiri Olsa
2022-01-06  4:30   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-01-06  8:41     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-06 16:32       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-06 21:53         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-01-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] libbpf: Add libbpf__kallsyms_parse function Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] libbpf: Add bpf_link_create support for multi kprobes Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] libbpf: Add bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts " Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04  8:09 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2022-01-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] selftest/bpf: Add bpf_cookie test for raw_k[ret]probe Jiri Olsa
2022-01-04 18:53 ` [RFC 00/13] kprobe/bpf: Add support to attach multiple kprobes Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-05  9:15   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-05 15:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-06  8:29   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-06 13:59     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-06 14:57       ` Jiri Olsa
2022-01-07  5:42         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-06 15:02       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-06 17:40       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-06 23:52         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-07  0:20           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-07 12:55             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-11 15:00 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] fprobe: Introduce fprobe function entry/exit probe Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-11 15:00   ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] fprobe: Add ftrace based probe APIs Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-11 15:00   ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] rethook: Add a generic return hook Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-11 15:00   ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] rethook: x86: Add rethook x86 implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-11 15:01   ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] fprobe: Add exit_handler support Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-12 22:28     ` kernel test robot
2022-01-13  2:29     ` kernel test robot
2022-01-13  2:29       ` kernel test robot
2022-01-24 22:24     ` kernel test robot
2022-01-11 15:01   ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] fprobe: Add sample program for fprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-11 15:01   ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] bpf: Add kprobe link for attaching raw kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-12 22:18     ` kernel test robot
2022-01-12 23:19     ` kernel test robot
2022-01-12 23:19       ` kernel test robot
2022-01-12 23:40     ` kernel test robot
2022-01-11 22:39   ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] fprobe: Introduce fprobe function entry/exit probe Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-12  7:33     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-12 11:08       ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220104080943.113249-13-jolsa@kernel.org \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.