All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 11/16] xfs: Introduce macros to represent new maximum extent counts for data/attr forks
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 16:42:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220105004205.GR31583@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211214084519.759272-12-chandan.babu@oracle.com>

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 02:15:14PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> This commit defines new macros to represent maximum extent counts allowed by
> filesystems which have support for large per-inode extent counters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c       |  8 +++-----
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c |  2 +-
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h     |  8 +++++---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c  |  3 ++-
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.c |  2 +-
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>  6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 4113622e9733..0ce58e4a9c44 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -61,10 +61,8 @@ xfs_bmap_compute_maxlevels(
>  	int		sz;		/* root block size */
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * The maximum number of extents in a file, hence the maximum number of
> -	 * leaf entries, is controlled by the size of the on-disk extent count,
> -	 * either a signed 32-bit number for the data fork, or a signed 16-bit
> -	 * number for the attr fork.
> +	 * The maximum number of extents in a fork, hence the maximum number of
> +	 * leaf entries, is controlled by the size of the on-disk extent count.
>  	 *
>  	 * Note that we can no longer assume that if we are in ATTR1 that the
>  	 * fork offset of all the inodes will be
> @@ -74,7 +72,7 @@ xfs_bmap_compute_maxlevels(
>  	 * ATTR2 we have to assume the worst case scenario of a minimum size
>  	 * available.
>  	 */
> -	maxleafents = xfs_iext_max_nextents(whichfork);
> +	maxleafents = xfs_iext_max_nextents(xfs_has_nrext64(mp), whichfork);
>  	if (whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK)
>  		sz = XFS_BMDR_SPACE_CALC(MINDBTPTRS);
>  	else
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c
> index 453309fc85f2..e8d21d69b9ff 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c
> @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ xfs_bmbt_maxlevels_ondisk(void)
>  	minrecs[1] = xfs_bmbt_block_maxrecs(blocklen, false) / 2;
>  
>  	/* One extra level for the inode root. */
> -	return xfs_btree_compute_maxlevels(minrecs, MAXEXTNUM) + 1;
> +	return xfs_btree_compute_maxlevels(minrecs, XFS_MAX_EXTCNT_DATA_FORK) + 1;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> index 9934c320bf01..eff86f6c4c99 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> @@ -873,9 +873,11 @@ enum xfs_dinode_fmt {
>  /*
>   * Max values for extlen, extnum, aextnum.
>   */
> -#define	MAXEXTLEN	((xfs_extlen_t)0x001fffff)	/* 21 bits */
> -#define	MAXEXTNUM	((xfs_extnum_t)0x7fffffff)	/* signed int */
> -#define	MAXAEXTNUM	((xfs_aextnum_t)0x7fff)		/* signed short */
> +#define	MAXEXTLEN			((xfs_extlen_t)0x1fffff)	/* 21 bits */
> +#define XFS_MAX_EXTCNT_DATA_FORK	((xfs_extnum_t)0xffffffffffff)	/* Unsigned 48-bits */
> +#define XFS_MAX_EXTCNT_ATTR_FORK	((xfs_aextnum_t)0xffffffff)	/* Unsigned 32-bits */
> +#define XFS_MAX_EXTCNT_DATA_FORK_OLD	((xfs_extnum_t)0x7fffffff)	/* Signed 32-bits */
> +#define XFS_MAX_EXTCNT_ATTR_FORK_OLD	((xfs_aextnum_t)0x7fff)		/* Signed 16-bits */

Could you change the #define value to a shift and subtract like you do
for MAXEXTLEN^WXFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN in patch 16?

e.g.

#define XFS_MAX_EXTCNT_DATA_FORK	((xfs_extnum_t)((1ULL << 48) - 1))

Also, you might want to document briefly in this header file why it is
that the bmbt is limited to 2^48 extents even though the dinode fields
are 64 bits wide and there can be up to 2^54 blocks mapped by a fork.
ISTR the reason is to avoid having the bmbt cursor cache have to handle
a 12-level btree or something, right?

(Sorry, it's been a while...)

>  
>  /*
>   * Inode minimum and maximum sizes.
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> index 860d32816909..34f360a38603 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> @@ -361,7 +361,8 @@ xfs_dinode_verify_fork(
>  			return __this_address;
>  		break;
>  	case XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE:
> -		max_extents = xfs_iext_max_nextents(whichfork);
> +		max_extents = xfs_iext_max_nextents(xfs_dinode_has_nrext64(dip),
> +					whichfork);
>  		if (di_nextents > max_extents)
>  			return __this_address;
>  		break;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.c
> index ce690abe5dce..a3a3b54f9c55 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.c
> @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ xfs_iext_count_may_overflow(
>  	if (whichfork == XFS_COW_FORK)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	max_exts = xfs_iext_max_nextents(whichfork);
> +	max_exts = xfs_iext_max_nextents(xfs_inode_has_nrext64(ip), whichfork);
>  
>  	if (XFS_TEST_ERROR(false, ip->i_mount, XFS_ERRTAG_REDUCE_MAX_IEXTENTS))
>  		max_exts = 10;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h
> index 4a8b77d425df..0cfc351648f9 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h
> @@ -133,12 +133,23 @@ static inline int8_t xfs_ifork_format(struct xfs_ifork *ifp)
>  	return ifp->if_format;
>  }
>  
> -static inline xfs_extnum_t xfs_iext_max_nextents(int whichfork)
> +static inline xfs_extnum_t xfs_iext_max_nextents(bool has_big_extcnt,

has_nrext64, to be consistent with most everywhere else?

--D

> +				int whichfork)
>  {
> -	if (whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK || whichfork == XFS_COW_FORK)
> -		return MAXEXTNUM;
> +	switch (whichfork) {
> +	case XFS_DATA_FORK:
> +	case XFS_COW_FORK:
> +		return has_big_extcnt ? XFS_MAX_EXTCNT_DATA_FORK
> +			: XFS_MAX_EXTCNT_DATA_FORK_OLD;
> +
> +	case XFS_ATTR_FORK:
> +		return has_big_extcnt ? XFS_MAX_EXTCNT_ATTR_FORK
> +			: XFS_MAX_EXTCNT_ATTR_FORK_OLD;
>  
> -	return MAXAEXTNUM;
> +	default:
> +		ASSERT(0);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static inline xfs_extnum_t
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-05  0:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-14  8:45 [PATCH V4 00/16] xfs: Extend per-inode extent counters Chandan Babu R
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 01/16] xfs: Move extent count limits to xfs_format.h Chandan Babu R
2022-01-04 23:28   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 02/16] xfs: Introduce xfs_iext_max_nextents() helper Chandan Babu R
2022-01-04 23:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 03/16] xfs: Use xfs_extnum_t instead of basic data types Chandan Babu R
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 04/16] xfs: Introduce xfs_dfork_nextents() helper Chandan Babu R
2022-01-04 23:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 05/16] xfs: Use basic types to define xfs_log_dinode's di_nextents and di_anextents Chandan Babu R
2022-01-04 23:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05 13:43     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 06/16] xfs: Promote xfs_extnum_t and xfs_aextnum_t to 64 and 32-bits respectively Chandan Babu R
2021-12-14 14:54   ` kernel test robot
2021-12-14 14:54     ` kernel test robot
2021-12-14 15:05   ` kernel test robot
2021-12-14 15:05     ` kernel test robot
2021-12-14 15:15   ` kernel test robot
2021-12-14 15:15     ` kernel test robot
2021-12-15  9:19     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-12-15  9:19       ` Chandan Babu R
2022-01-04 23:54       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-04 23:54         ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05 14:14         ` Chandan Babu R
2022-01-05 14:14           ` Chandan Babu R
2022-01-05 17:21           ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05 17:21             ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-06  7:03             ` Chandan Babu R
2022-01-06  7:03               ` Chandan Babu R
2022-01-06 20:31               ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-06 20:31                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 07/16] xfs: Introduce XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NREXT64 and associated per-fs feature bit Chandan Babu R
2022-01-05  0:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 08/16] xfs: Introduce XFS_FSOP_GEOM_FLAGS_NREXT64 Chandan Babu R
2022-01-05  0:05   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05 13:44     ` Chandan Babu R
2022-01-05 17:22       ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 09/16] xfs: Introduce XFS_DIFLAG2_NREXT64 and associated helpers Chandan Babu R
2022-01-05  0:43   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 10/16] xfs: Use xfs_rfsblock_t to count maximum blocks that can be used by BMBT Chandan Babu R
2021-12-14 18:15   ` kernel test robot
2021-12-14 18:15     ` kernel test robot
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 11/16] xfs: Introduce macros to represent new maximum extent counts for data/attr forks Chandan Babu R
2022-01-05  0:42   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-01-05 13:46     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 12/16] xfs: Introduce per-inode 64-bit extent counters Chandan Babu R
2022-01-05  1:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05 13:47     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 13/16] xfs: Conditionally upgrade existing inodes to use " Chandan Babu R
2022-01-05  0:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05 13:49     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 14/16] xfs: Enable bulkstat ioctl to support 64-bit per-inode " Chandan Babu R
2022-01-05  0:28   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05 13:50     ` Chandan Babu R
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 15/16] xfs: Add XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NREXT64 to the list of supported flags Chandan Babu R
2022-01-05  0:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-14  8:45 ` [PATCH V4 16/16] xfs: Define max extent length based on on-disk format definition Chandan Babu R
2022-01-05  0:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05 13:51     ` Chandan Babu R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220105004205.GR31583@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.