From: "Dirk Müller" <dmueller@suse.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Dirk Müller" <dmueller@suse.de>, "Paul Menzel" <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/raid6: Use strict priority ranking for pq gen() benchmarking
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 17:38:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220105163847.18592-2-dmueller@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220105163847.18592-1-dmueller@suse.de>
On x86_64, currently 3 variants of AVX512, 3 variants of AVX2
and 3 variants of SSE2 are benchmarked on initialization, taking
between 144-153 jiffies. Testing across a hardware pool of
various generations of intel cpus I could not find a single
case where SSE2 won over AVX2 or AVX512. There are cases where
AVX2 wins over AVX512 however.
Change "prefer" into an integer priority field (similar to
how recov selection works) to have more than one ranking level
available, which is backwards compatible with existing behavior.
Give AVX2/512 variants higher priority over SSE2 in order to skip
SSE testing when AVX is available. in a AVX2/x86_64/HZ=250 case this
saves in the order of 200ms of initialization time.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Müller <dmueller@suse.de>
Acked-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
---
include/linux/raid/pq.h | 2 +-
lib/raid6/algos.c | 2 +-
lib/raid6/avx2.c | 8 ++++----
lib/raid6/avx512.c | 6 +++---
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/raid/pq.h b/include/linux/raid/pq.h
index 154e954b711d..d6e5a1feb947 100644
--- a/include/linux/raid/pq.h
+++ b/include/linux/raid/pq.h
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ struct raid6_calls {
void (*xor_syndrome)(int, int, int, size_t, void **);
int (*valid)(void); /* Returns 1 if this routine set is usable */
const char *name; /* Name of this routine set */
- int prefer; /* Has special performance attribute */
+ int priority; /* Relative priority ranking if non-zero */
};
/* Selected algorithm */
diff --git a/lib/raid6/algos.c b/lib/raid6/algos.c
index 9b7e8a837b27..39b74221f4a7 100644
--- a/lib/raid6/algos.c
+++ b/lib/raid6/algos.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static inline const struct raid6_calls *raid6_choose_gen(
const struct raid6_calls *best;
for (bestgenperf = 0, best = NULL, algo = raid6_algos; *algo; algo++) {
- if (!best || (*algo)->prefer >= best->prefer) {
+ if (!best || (*algo)->priority >= best->priority) {
if ((*algo)->valid && !(*algo)->valid())
continue;
diff --git a/lib/raid6/avx2.c b/lib/raid6/avx2.c
index f299476e1d76..059024234dce 100644
--- a/lib/raid6/avx2.c
+++ b/lib/raid6/avx2.c
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ const struct raid6_calls raid6_avx2x1 = {
raid6_avx21_xor_syndrome,
raid6_have_avx2,
"avx2x1",
- 1 /* Has cache hints */
+ .priority = 2 /* Prefer AVX2 over priority 1 (SSE2 and others) */
};
/*
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ const struct raid6_calls raid6_avx2x2 = {
raid6_avx22_xor_syndrome,
raid6_have_avx2,
"avx2x2",
- 1 /* Has cache hints */
+ .priority = 2 /* Prefer AVX2 over priority 1 (SSE2 and others) */
};
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
@@ -465,6 +465,6 @@ const struct raid6_calls raid6_avx2x4 = {
raid6_avx24_xor_syndrome,
raid6_have_avx2,
"avx2x4",
- 1 /* Has cache hints */
+ .priority = 2 /* Prefer AVX2 over priority 1 (SSE2 and others) */
};
-#endif
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
diff --git a/lib/raid6/avx512.c b/lib/raid6/avx512.c
index bb684d144ee2..9c3e822e1adf 100644
--- a/lib/raid6/avx512.c
+++ b/lib/raid6/avx512.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ const struct raid6_calls raid6_avx512x1 = {
raid6_avx5121_xor_syndrome,
raid6_have_avx512,
"avx512x1",
- 1 /* Has cache hints */
+ .priority = 2 /* Prefer AVX512 over priority 1 (SSE2 and others) */
};
/*
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ const struct raid6_calls raid6_avx512x2 = {
raid6_avx5122_xor_syndrome,
raid6_have_avx512,
"avx512x2",
- 1 /* Has cache hints */
+ .priority = 2 /* Prefer AVX512 over priority 1 (SSE2 and others) */
};
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ const struct raid6_calls raid6_avx512x4 = {
raid6_avx5124_xor_syndrome,
raid6_have_avx512,
"avx512x4",
- 1 /* Has cache hints */
+ .priority = 2 /* Prefer AVX512 over priority 1 (SSE2 and others) */
};
#endif
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-05 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-05 16:38 [PATCH v2 1/2] lib/raid6: skip benchmark of non-chosen xor_syndrome functions Dirk Müller
2022-01-05 16:38 ` Dirk Müller [this message]
2022-01-05 18:55 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220105163847.18592-2-dmueller@suse.de \
--to=dmueller@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.