From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Yao Hongbo <yaohongbo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, lukas@wunner.de,
zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com,
alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] PCI: Waiting command completed in get_port_device_capability()
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:58:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220113145857.GA347384@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d47e5af3-d339-01b6-5925-a2037b177be2@linux.alibaba.com>
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 03:34:41PM +0800, Yao Hongbo wrote:
> 在 2022/1/13 上午2:01, Bjorn Helgaas 写道:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 03:33:25PM +0800, Yao Hongbo wrote:
> >> 在 2022/1/12 上午2:55, Bjorn Helgaas 写道:
> >>> What kind of system are you seeing the problem on? It seems like it
> >>> should be safe to drop the HPIE and CCIE disable here for ACPI
> >>> systems. And *likely* we could do the same for non-ACPI systems,
> >>> though I have no experience there.
> >>
> >> Hi, Bjorn
> >> Thanks for your comments.
> >>
> >> The problem occurs on ACPI systems.
> >>
> >> acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS supports [ExtendedConfig ASPM ClockPM Segments MSI EDR HPX-Type3]
> >> acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: platform does not support [SHPCHotplug AER LTR DPC]
> >> acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS now controls [PCIeHotplug PME PCIeCapability]
> >>
> >> We clear HPIE and CCIE here because the firmware doesn't control
> >> Hotplug via __OSC.
> >>
> >> And on ACPI systems, we can also set pcie_ports=native, which will
> >> also encounter such problems.
> >
> > What happens if you just drop that call like the patch below?
> >
> > If that avoids the problem, then we can talk about whether we need to
> > worry about broken firmware in the non-ACPI or "pcie_ports=native"
> > cases.
>
> Hi, Bjorn.
> This can avoid the problem currently.
Thanks for collecting that data!
> But i'm not sure if removing this code will introduce other problems,
> such as suprious hotplug before probing hotplug service.
I don't think spurious hotplug before probing the hotplug service is
an issue because there is always a window like this. It's either
between:
A: Handoff from firmware to OS
B: get_port_device_capability()
or between:
A: Handoff from firmware to OS
C: pciehp initialization
Either way there is *some* window, and we have to decide how to deal
with it. The exact duration is not very important.
Bjorn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-13 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-07 3:22 [RFC PATCH v2] PCI: Waiting command completed in get_port_device_capability() Yao Hongbo
2022-01-11 18:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-11 21:55 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-01-12 7:33 ` Yao Hongbo
2022-01-12 18:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-13 7:34 ` Yao Hongbo
2022-01-13 14:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220113145857.GA347384@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=yaohongbo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.