All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Jakob Naucke <Jakob.Naucke@ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] virtio: fix the condition for iommu_platform not supported
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 20:54:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220113205452.4443ee4e.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113115617-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:11:42 -0500
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 05:51:31PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > The commit 04ceb61a40 ("virtio: Fail if iommu_platform is requested, but
> > unsupported") claims to fail the device hotplug when iommu_platform
> > is requested, but not supported by the (vhost) device. On the first
> > glance the condition for detecting that situation looks perfect, but
> > because a certain peculiarity of virtio_platform it ain't.
> > 
> > In fact the aforementioned commit introduces a regression. It breaks
> > virtio-fs support for Secure Execution, and most likely also for AMD SEV
> > or any other confidential guest scenario that relies encrypted guest
> > memory.  The same also applies to any other vhost device that does not
> > negotiate _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM.
> > 
> > The peculiarity is that iommu_platform and _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM collates
> > "device can not access all of the guest ram" and "iova != gpa, thus
> > device needs to translate iova".
> > 
> > Confidential guest technologies currently rely on the device/hypervisor
> > offering _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM to grant access to whatever the device needs
> > to see, because of the first. But, generally, they don't care for the
> > second.
> > 
> > This is the very reason for which commit 7ef7e6e3b ("vhost: correctly
> > turn on VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM") for, which fences _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
> > form the vhost device that does not need it, because on the vhost
> > interface it only means "I/O address translation is needed".
> > 
> > This patch takes inspiration from 7ef7e6e3b ("vhost: correctly turn on
> > VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM"),  
> 
> Strange, I could not find this commit. Did you mean f7ef7e6e3b?
> 

Right! Copy-paste error.


 
 static void *vhost_memory_map(struct vhost_dev *dev, hwaddr addr,
@@ -765,6 +772,9 @@ static int vhost_dev_set_features(struct vhost_dev *dev,
     if (enable_log) {
         features |= 0x1ULL << VHOST_F_LOG_ALL;
     }
+    if (!vhost_dev_has_iommu(dev)) {
+        features &= ~(0x1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
+    }
     r = dev->vhost_ops->vhost_set_features(dev, features);
     if (r < 0) {
         VHOST_OPS_DEBUG("vhost_set_features failed");

> > and uses the same condition for detecting the
> > situation when _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM is requested, but no I/O translation
> > by the device, and thus no device capability is needed.
> >
> > In this
> > situation claiming that the device does not support iommu_plattform=on
> > is counter-productive. So let us stop doing that!
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > Reported-by: Jakob Naucke <Jakob.Naucke@ibm.com>
> > Fixes: 04ceb61a40 ("virtio: Fail if iommu_platform is requested, but
> > unsupported")
> > Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > @Kevin: Can you please verify, that I don't break your fix?  
> 
> So which configurations did you test for this?

I tested it with virtio-fs and qemu-system-s390x with -device
vhost-user-fs-ccw,iommu_platform=on,...

Regards,
Halil

> 
> > ---
> >  hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c | 11 ++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c
> > index d23db98c56..c1578f3de2 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c
> > @@ -69,11 +69,6 @@ void virtio_bus_device_plugged(VirtIODevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> >          return;
> >      }
> >  
> > -    if (has_iommu && !virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)) {
> > -        error_setg(errp, "iommu_platform=true is not supported by the device");
> > -        return;
> > -    }
> > -
> >      if (klass->device_plugged != NULL) {
> >          klass->device_plugged(qbus->parent, &local_err);
> >      }
> > @@ -88,6 +83,12 @@ void virtio_bus_device_plugged(VirtIODevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> >      } else {
> >          vdev->dma_as = &address_space_memory;
> >      }
> > +
> > +    if (has_iommu && vdev->dma_as != &address_space_memory
> > +                  && !virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)) {
> > +        error_setg(errp, "iommu_platform=true is not supported by the device");
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> >  }
> >  /* Reset the virtio_bus */
> > 
> > base-commit: f8d75e10d3e0033a0a29a7a7e4777a4fbc17a016
> > -- 
> > 2.32.0  
> 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-13 16:51 [PATCH 1/1] virtio: fix the condition for iommu_platform not supported Halil Pasic
2022-01-13 17:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-13 19:54   ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2022-01-14 16:05     ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-14 18:07       ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220113205452.4443ee4e.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=Jakob.Naucke@ibm.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.