From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
like.xu.linux@gmail.com, daviddunn@google.com,
cloudliang@tencent.com
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/6] selftests: kvm/x86: Add test for KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 21:24:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220115052431.447232-7-jmattson@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220115052431.447232-1-jmattson@google.com>
Verify that the PMU event filter works as expected.
Note that the virtual PMU doesn't work as expected on AMD Zen CPUs (an
intercepted rdmsr is counted as a retired branch instruction), but the
PMU event filter does work.
Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
.../kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c | 438 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 440 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
index 8c129961accf..7834e03ab159 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
/x86_64/mmio_warning_test
/x86_64/mmu_role_test
/x86_64/platform_info_test
+/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test
/x86_64/set_boot_cpu_id
/x86_64/set_sregs_test
/x86_64/sev_migrate_tests
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index c407ebbec2c1..899413a6588f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/kvm_pv_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/mmio_warning_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/mmu_role_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/platform_info_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/set_boot_cpu_id
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/set_sregs_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/smm_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1cf697fca7aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,438 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Test for x86 KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC.
+ *
+ * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2.
+ *
+ * Verifies the expected behavior of allow lists and deny lists for
+ * virtual PMU events.
+ */
+
+#define _GNU_SOURCE /* for program_invocation_short_name */
+#include "test_util.h"
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "processor.h"
+
+/*
+ * In lieu of copying perf_event.h into tools...
+ */
+#define ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS (1ULL << 17)
+#define ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE (1ULL << 22)
+
+union cpuid10_eax {
+ struct {
+ unsigned int version_id:8;
+ unsigned int num_counters:8;
+ unsigned int bit_width:8;
+ unsigned int mask_length:8;
+ } split;
+ unsigned int full;
+};
+
+union cpuid10_ebx {
+ struct {
+ unsigned int no_unhalted_core_cycles:1;
+ unsigned int no_instructions_retired:1;
+ unsigned int no_unhalted_reference_cycles:1;
+ unsigned int no_llc_reference:1;
+ unsigned int no_llc_misses:1;
+ unsigned int no_branch_instruction_retired:1;
+ unsigned int no_branch_misses_retired:1;
+ } split;
+ unsigned int full;
+};
+
+/* End of stuff taken from perf_event.h. */
+
+/* Oddly, this isn't in perf_event.h. */
+#define ARCH_PERFMON_BRANCHES_RETIRED 5
+
+#define VCPU_ID 0
+#define NUM_BRANCHES 42
+
+/*
+ * This is how the event selector and unit mask are stored in an AMD
+ * core performance event-select register. Intel's format is similar,
+ * but the event selector is only 8 bits.
+ */
+#define EVENT(select, umask) ((select & 0xf00UL) << 24 | (select & 0xff) | \
+ (umask & 0xff) << 8)
+
+/*
+ * "Branch instructions retired", from the Intel SDM, volume 3,
+ * "Pre-defined Architectural Performance Events."
+ */
+
+#define INTEL_BR_RETIRED EVENT(0xc4, 0)
+
+/*
+ * "Retired branch instructions", from Processor Programming Reference
+ * (PPR) for AMD Family 17h Model 01h, Revision B1 Processors,
+ * Preliminary Processor Programming Reference (PPR) for AMD Family
+ * 17h Model 31h, Revision B0 Processors, and Preliminary Processor
+ * Programming Reference (PPR) for AMD Family 19h Model 01h, Revision
+ * B1 Processors Volume 1 of 2.
+ */
+
+#define AMD_ZEN_BR_RETIRED EVENT(0xc2, 0)
+
+/*
+ * This event list comprises Intel's eight architectural events plus
+ * AMD's "retired branch instructions" for Zen[123] (and possibly
+ * other AMD CPUs).
+ */
+static const uint64_t event_list[] = {
+ EVENT(0x3c, 0),
+ EVENT(0xc0, 0),
+ EVENT(0x3c, 1),
+ EVENT(0x2e, 0x4f),
+ EVENT(0x2e, 0x41),
+ EVENT(0xc4, 0),
+ EVENT(0xc5, 0),
+ EVENT(0xa4, 1),
+ AMD_ZEN_BR_RETIRED,
+};
+
+/*
+ * If we encounter a #GP during the guest PMU sanity check, then the guest
+ * PMU is not functional. Inform the hypervisor via GUEST_SYNC(0).
+ */
+static void guest_gp_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
+{
+ GUEST_SYNC(0);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check that we can write a new value to the given MSR and read it back.
+ * The caller should provide a non-empty set of bits that are safe to flip.
+ *
+ * Return on success. GUEST_SYNC(0) on error.
+ */
+static void check_msr(uint32_t msr, uint64_t bits_to_flip)
+{
+ uint64_t v = rdmsr(msr) ^ bits_to_flip;
+
+ wrmsr(msr, v);
+ if (rdmsr(msr) != v)
+ GUEST_SYNC(0);
+
+ v ^= bits_to_flip;
+ wrmsr(msr, v);
+ if (rdmsr(msr) != v)
+ GUEST_SYNC(0);
+}
+
+static void intel_guest_code(void)
+{
+ check_msr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 1);
+ check_msr(MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0, 0xffff);
+ check_msr(MSR_IA32_PMC0, 0xffff);
+ GUEST_SYNC(1);
+
+ for (;;) {
+ uint64_t br0, br1;
+
+ wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0);
+ wrmsr(MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE |
+ ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS | INTEL_BR_RETIRED);
+ wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 1);
+ br0 = rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PMC0);
+ __asm__ __volatile__("loop ." : "+c"((int){NUM_BRANCHES}));
+ br1 = rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PMC0);
+ GUEST_SYNC(br1 - br0);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * To avoid needing a check for CPUID.80000001:ECX.PerfCtrExtCore[bit 23],
+ * this code uses the always-available, legacy K7 PMU MSRs, which alias to
+ * the first four of the six extended core PMU MSRs.
+ */
+static void amd_guest_code(void)
+{
+ check_msr(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0, 0xffff);
+ check_msr(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0, 0xffff);
+ GUEST_SYNC(1);
+
+ for (;;) {
+ uint64_t br0, br1;
+
+ wrmsr(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0, 0);
+ wrmsr(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE |
+ ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS | AMD_ZEN_BR_RETIRED);
+ br0 = rdmsr(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0);
+ __asm__ __volatile__("loop ." : "+c"((int){NUM_BRANCHES}));
+ br1 = rdmsr(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0);
+ GUEST_SYNC(br1 - br0);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Run the VM to the next GUEST_SYNC(value), and return the value passed
+ * to the sync. Any other exit from the guest is fatal.
+ */
+static uint64_t run_vm_to_sync(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+ struct ucall uc;
+
+ vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
+ TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO,
+ "Exit_reason other than KVM_EXIT_IO: %u (%s)\n",
+ run->exit_reason,
+ exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
+ get_ucall(vm, VCPU_ID, &uc);
+ TEST_ASSERT(uc.cmd == UCALL_SYNC,
+ "Received ucall other than UCALL_SYNC: %lu", uc.cmd);
+ return uc.args[1];
+}
+
+/*
+ * In a nested environment or if the vPMU is disabled, the guest PMU
+ * might not work as architected (accessing the PMU MSRs may raise
+ * #GP, or writes could simply be discarded). In those situations,
+ * there is no point in running these tests. The guest code will perform
+ * a sanity check and then GUEST_SYNC(success). In the case of failure,
+ * the behavior of the guest on resumption is undefined.
+ */
+static bool sanity_check_pmu(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+ bool success;
+
+ vm_install_exception_handler(vm, GP_VECTOR, guest_gp_handler);
+ success = run_vm_to_sync(vm);
+ vm_install_exception_handler(vm, GP_VECTOR, NULL);
+
+ return success;
+}
+
+static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *make_pmu_event_filter(uint32_t nevents)
+{
+ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f;
+ int size = sizeof(*f) + nevents * sizeof(f->events[0]);
+
+ f = malloc(size);
+ TEST_ASSERT(f, "Out of memory");
+ memset(f, 0, size);
+ f->nevents = nevents;
+ return f;
+}
+
+static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *event_filter(uint32_t action)
+{
+ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f;
+ int i;
+
+ f = make_pmu_event_filter(ARRAY_SIZE(event_list));
+ f->action = action;
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(event_list); i++)
+ f->events[i] = event_list[i];
+
+ return f;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Remove the first occurrence of 'event' (if any) from the filter's
+ * event list.
+ */
+static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *remove_event(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f,
+ uint64_t event)
+{
+ bool found = false;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < f->nevents; i++) {
+ if (found)
+ f->events[i - 1] = f->events[i];
+ else
+ found = f->events[i] == event;
+ }
+ if (found)
+ f->nevents--;
+ return f;
+}
+
+static void test_without_filter(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+ uint64_t count = run_vm_to_sync(vm);
+
+ if (count != NUM_BRANCHES)
+ pr_info("%s: Branch instructions retired = %lu (expected %u)\n",
+ __func__, count, NUM_BRANCHES);
+ TEST_ASSERT(count, "Allowed PMU event is not counting");
+}
+
+static uint64_t test_with_filter(struct kvm_vm *vm,
+ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f)
+{
+ vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER, (void *)f);
+ return run_vm_to_sync(vm);
+}
+
+static void test_member_deny_list(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f = event_filter(KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY);
+ uint64_t count = test_with_filter(vm, f);
+
+ free(f);
+ if (count)
+ pr_info("%s: Branch instructions retired = %lu (expected 0)\n",
+ __func__, count);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!count, "Disallowed PMU Event is counting");
+}
+
+static void test_member_allow_list(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f = event_filter(KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW);
+ uint64_t count = test_with_filter(vm, f);
+
+ free(f);
+ if (count != NUM_BRANCHES)
+ pr_info("%s: Branch instructions retired = %lu (expected %u)\n",
+ __func__, count, NUM_BRANCHES);
+ TEST_ASSERT(count, "Allowed PMU event is not counting");
+}
+
+static void test_not_member_deny_list(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f = event_filter(KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY);
+ uint64_t count;
+
+ remove_event(f, INTEL_BR_RETIRED);
+ remove_event(f, AMD_ZEN_BR_RETIRED);
+ count = test_with_filter(vm, f);
+ free(f);
+ if (count != NUM_BRANCHES)
+ pr_info("%s: Branch instructions retired = %lu (expected %u)\n",
+ __func__, count, NUM_BRANCHES);
+ TEST_ASSERT(count, "Allowed PMU event is not counting");
+}
+
+static void test_not_member_allow_list(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f = event_filter(KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW);
+ uint64_t count;
+
+ remove_event(f, INTEL_BR_RETIRED);
+ remove_event(f, AMD_ZEN_BR_RETIRED);
+ count = test_with_filter(vm, f);
+ free(f);
+ if (count)
+ pr_info("%s: Branch instructions retired = %lu (expected 0)\n",
+ __func__, count);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!count, "Disallowed PMU Event is counting");
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check for a non-zero PMU version, at least one general-purpose
+ * counter per logical processor, an EBX bit vector of length greater
+ * than 5, and EBX[5] clear.
+ */
+static bool check_intel_pmu_leaf(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry)
+{
+ union cpuid10_eax eax = { .full = entry->eax };
+ union cpuid10_ebx ebx = { .full = entry->ebx };
+
+ return eax.split.version_id && eax.split.num_counters > 0 &&
+ eax.split.mask_length > ARCH_PERFMON_BRANCHES_RETIRED &&
+ !ebx.split.no_branch_instruction_retired;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Note that CPUID leaf 0xa is Intel-specific. This leaf should be
+ * clear on AMD hardware.
+ */
+static bool use_intel_pmu(void)
+{
+ struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
+ struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid;
+
+ cpuid = kvm_get_supported_cpuid();
+ entry = kvm_get_supported_cpuid_index(0xa, 0);
+ return is_intel_cpu() && entry && check_intel_pmu_leaf(entry);
+}
+
+static bool is_zen1(uint32_t eax)
+{
+ return x86_family(eax) == 0x17 && x86_model(eax) <= 0x0f;
+}
+
+static bool is_zen2(uint32_t eax)
+{
+ return x86_family(eax) == 0x17 &&
+ x86_model(eax) >= 0x30 && x86_model(eax) <= 0x3f;
+}
+
+static bool is_zen3(uint32_t eax)
+{
+ return x86_family(eax) == 0x19 && x86_model(eax) <= 0x0f;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Determining AMD support for a PMU event requires consulting the AMD
+ * PPR for the CPU or reference material derived therefrom. The AMD
+ * test code herein has been verified to work on Zen1, Zen2, and Zen3.
+ *
+ * Feel free to add more AMD CPUs that are documented to support event
+ * select 0xc2 umask 0 as "retired branch instructions."
+ */
+static bool use_amd_pmu(void)
+{
+ struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
+ struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid;
+
+ cpuid = kvm_get_supported_cpuid();
+ entry = kvm_get_supported_cpuid_index(1, 0);
+ return is_amd_cpu() && entry &&
+ (is_zen1(entry->eax) ||
+ is_zen2(entry->eax) ||
+ is_zen3(entry->eax));
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ void (*guest_code)(void) = NULL;
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ int r;
+
+ /* Tell stdout not to buffer its content */
+ setbuf(stdout, NULL);
+
+ r = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_FILTER);
+ if (!r) {
+ print_skip("KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_FILTER not supported");
+ exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+ }
+
+ if (use_intel_pmu())
+ guest_code = intel_guest_code;
+ else if (use_amd_pmu())
+ guest_code = amd_guest_code;
+
+ if (!guest_code) {
+ print_skip("Don't know how to test this guest PMU");
+ exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+ }
+
+ vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code);
+
+ vm_init_descriptor_tables(vm);
+ vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vm, VCPU_ID);
+
+ if (!sanity_check_pmu(vm)) {
+ print_skip("Guest PMU is not functional");
+ exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+ }
+
+ test_without_filter(vm);
+ test_member_deny_list(vm);
+ test_member_allow_list(vm);
+ test_not_member_deny_list(vm);
+ test_not_member_allow_list(vm);
+
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.34.1.703.g22d0c6ccf7-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-15 5:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-15 5:24 [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: x86/pmu: Use binary search to check filtered events Jim Mattson
2022-01-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] " Jim Mattson
2022-01-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] selftests: kvm/x86: Parameterize the CPUID vendor string check Jim Mattson
2022-01-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] selftests: kvm/x86: Introduce is_amd_cpu() Jim Mattson
2022-01-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] selftests: kvm/x86: Export x86_family() for use outside of processor.c Jim Mattson
2022-01-15 5:24 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] selftests: kvm/x86: Introduce x86_model() Jim Mattson
2022-01-15 5:24 ` Jim Mattson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220115052431.447232-7-jmattson@google.com \
--to=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
--cc=daviddunn@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.