All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs-progs: check/lowmem: fix crash when METADATA_ITEM has invalid level
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:38:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117023850.40337-2-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220117023850.40337-1-wqu@suse.com>

[BUG]
When running lowmem mode with METADATA_ITEM which has invalid level, it
will crash with the following backtrace:

 (gdb) bt
 #0  0x0000555555616b0b in btrfs_header_bytenr (eb=0x4)
     at ./kernel-shared/ctree.h:2134
 #1  0x0000555555620c78 in check_tree_block_backref (root_id=5,
     bytenr=30457856, level=256) at check/mode-lowmem.c:3818
 #2  0x0000555555621f6c in check_extent_item (path=0x7fffffffd9c0)
     at check/mode-lowmem.c:4334
 #3  0x00005555556235a5 in check_leaf_items (root=0x555555688e10,
     path=0x7fffffffd9c0, nrefs=0x7fffffffda30, account_bytes=1)
     at check/mode-lowmem.c:4835
 #4  0x0000555555623c6d in walk_down_tree (root=0x555555688e10,
     path=0x7fffffffd9c0, level=0x7fffffffd984, nrefs=0x7fffffffda30,
     check_all=1) at check/mode-lowmem.c:4967
 #5  0x000055555562494f in check_btrfs_root (root=0x555555688e10, check_all=1)
     at check/mode-lowmem.c:5266
 #6  0x00005555556254ee in check_chunks_and_extents_lowmem ()
     at check/mode-lowmem.c:5556
 #7  0x00005555555f0b82 in do_check_chunks_and_extents () at check/main.c:9114
 #8  0x00005555555f50ea in cmd_check (cmd=0x55555567c640 <cmd_struct_check>,
     argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffdec0) at check/main.c:10892
 #9  0x000055555556b2b1 in cmd_execute (argv=0x7fffffffdec0, argc=3,
     cmd=0x55555567c640 <cmd_struct_check>) at cmds/commands.h:125

[CAUSE]
For function check_extent_item() it will go through inline extent items
and then check their backrefs.

But for METADATA_ITEM, it doesn't really validate key.offset, which is
u64 and can contain value way larger than BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL (mostly caused
by bit flip).

In that case, if we have a larger value like 256 in key.offset, then
later check_tree_block_backref() will use 256 as level, and overflow
path->nodes[level] and crash.

[FIX]
Just verify the level, no matter if it's from btrfs_tree_block_level()
(which is just u8), or it's from key.offset (which is u64).

To do the check properly and detect higher bits corruption, also change
the type of @level from u8 to u64.

Now lowmem mode can detect the problem properly:

 ...
 [2/7] checking extents
 ERROR: tree block 30457856 has bad backref level, has 256 expect [0, 7]
 ERROR: extent[30457856 16384] level mismatch, wanted: 0, have: 256
 ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
 [3/7] checking free space tree
 ...

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
 check/mode-lowmem.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/check/mode-lowmem.c b/check/mode-lowmem.c
index cc6773cd4d0c..99f519631a50 100644
--- a/check/mode-lowmem.c
+++ b/check/mode-lowmem.c
@@ -4242,7 +4242,7 @@ static int check_extent_item(struct btrfs_path *path)
 	u64 owner_offset;
 	u64 super_gen;
 	int metadata = 0;
-	int level;
+	u64 level;	/* To handle corrupted values in skinny backref */
 	struct btrfs_key key;
 	int ret;
 	int err = 0;
@@ -4303,6 +4303,16 @@ static int check_extent_item(struct btrfs_path *path)
 		/* New METADATA_ITEM */
 		level = key.offset;
 	}
+
+	if (metadata && level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL) {
+		error(
+	"tree block %llu has bad backref level, has %llu expect [0, %u]",
+		      key.objectid, level, BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1);
+		err |= BACKREF_MISMATCH;
+		/* This is a critical error, exit right now */
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	ptr_offset = ptr - (unsigned long)ei;
 
 next:
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-17  2:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-17  2:38 [PATCH 0/3] btrfs-progs: fsck: detect obviously invalid metadata backref level Qu Wenruo
2022-01-17  2:38 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2022-01-17  2:47   ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs-progs: check/lowmem: fix crash when METADATA_ITEM has invalid level Su Yue
2022-01-17  2:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: check/original: reject bad metadata backref with " Qu Wenruo
2022-01-17  2:48   ` Su Yue
2022-02-01 17:34     ` David Sterba
2022-01-17  2:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: tests/fsck: add test image with invalid metadata backref level Qu Wenruo
2022-02-01 17:37 ` [PATCH 0/3] btrfs-progs: fsck: detect obviously " David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220117023850.40337-2-wqu@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.