From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, riel@surriel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/debug: Remove mpol_get/put and task_lock/unlock from sched_show_numa
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:28:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220118065828.GA451532@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220118050515.2973-1-bharata@amd.com>
* Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com> [2022-01-18 10:35:15]:
> The older format of /proc/pid/sched printed home node info which
> required the mempolicy and task lock around mpol_get(). However
> the format has changed since then and there is no need for
> sched_show_numa() any more to have mempolicy argument,
> asssociated mpol_get/put and task_lock/unlock. Remove them.
>
> Fixes: 397f2378f1361 ("sched/numa: Fix numa balancing stats in /proc/pid/sched")
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Agree. Since pol is now being used, this whole hunk can be removed.
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/debug.c | 10 ----------
> 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index 7dcbaa31c5d9..50e05c8d0d61 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -931,25 +931,15 @@ void print_numa_stats(struct seq_file *m, int node, unsigned long tsf,
> static void sched_show_numa(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> - struct mempolicy *pol;
> -
> if (p->mm)
> P(mm->numa_scan_seq);
>
> - task_lock(p);
> - pol = p->mempolicy;
> - if (pol && !(pol->flags & MPOL_F_MORON))
> - pol = NULL;
> - mpol_get(pol);
> - task_unlock(p);
> -
> P(numa_pages_migrated);
> P(numa_preferred_nid);
> P(total_numa_faults);
> SEQ_printf(m, "current_node=%d, numa_group_id=%d\n",
> task_node(p), task_numa_group_id(p));
> show_numa_stats(p, m);
> - mpol_put(pol);
> #endif
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-18 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-18 5:05 [PATCH] sched/debug: Remove mpol_get/put and task_lock/unlock from sched_show_numa Bharata B Rao
2022-01-18 6:58 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2022-01-18 10:20 ` Mel Gorman
2022-01-18 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-28 7:40 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Bharata B Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220118065828.GA451532@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.