All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20220119080859.GB4977@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 440bc48..aafd449 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -55,3 +55,9 @@ This is what I am worried about. Before, if CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is
 unset, those relevant codes are not compiled in. I can't see what
 benefit is brought in if compiled in the unneeded code block. Do I miss
 anything?
+
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-riscv mailing list
+linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 7ae5d6e..866c9f9 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,9 +2,27 @@
  "ref\020220116133847.GE2388@MiWiFi-R3L-srv\0"
  "ref\0YebK70Sx4w8zLfj/@xhacker\0"
  "From\0Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 19 Jan 2022 16:08:59 +0800\0"
- "To\0kexec@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>\0"
+ "Cc\0Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>"
+  Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
+  Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
+  Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
+  Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
+  Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
+  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
+  Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
+  Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
+  Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
+  x86@kernel.org
+  hpa@zytor.com
+  Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  kexec@lists.infradead.org
+ " Alexandre ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 01/18/22 at 10:13pm, Jisheng Zhang wrote:\n"
@@ -63,6 +81,12 @@
  "This is what I am worried about. Before, if CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is\n"
  "unset, those relevant codes are not compiled in. I can't see what\n"
  "benefit is brought in if compiled in the unneeded code block. Do I miss\n"
- anything?
+ "anything?\n"
+ "\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-riscv mailing list\n"
+ "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
 
-9b807b6ce1aa94fafee32c3ff23c3041ff0a8f2e65cb5f584826150b3079069f
+3bcc9dfb439caee2acfbf211c2321caed2c66c61475fa5ba8f1e850c8838576a

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 440bc48..5c27214 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -55,3 +55,9 @@ This is what I am worried about. Before, if CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is
 unset, those relevant codes are not compiled in. I can't see what
 benefit is brought in if compiled in the unneeded code block. Do I miss
 anything?
+
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-arm-kernel mailing list
+linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 7ae5d6e..add68b2 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -2,9 +2,27 @@
  "ref\020220116133847.GE2388@MiWiFi-R3L-srv\0"
  "ref\0YebK70Sx4w8zLfj/@xhacker\0"
  "From\0Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 19 Jan 2022 16:08:59 +0800\0"
- "To\0kexec@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>\0"
+ "Cc\0Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>"
+  Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
+  Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
+  Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
+  Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
+  Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
+  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
+  Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
+  Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
+  Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
+  x86@kernel.org
+  hpa@zytor.com
+  Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  kexec@lists.infradead.org
+ " Alexandre ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 01/18/22 at 10:13pm, Jisheng Zhang wrote:\n"
@@ -63,6 +81,12 @@
  "This is what I am worried about. Before, if CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is\n"
  "unset, those relevant codes are not compiled in. I can't see what\n"
  "benefit is brought in if compiled in the unneeded code block. Do I miss\n"
- anything?
+ "anything?\n"
+ "\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
 
-9b807b6ce1aa94fafee32c3ff23c3041ff0a8f2e65cb5f584826150b3079069f
+d5962740c7e22646a93d59f278a57f570df9eaa55cff3cb76ea2b614b4d5eaae

diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest
index 7ae5d6e..2f03e58 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N3/content_digest
@@ -2,9 +2,27 @@
  "ref\020220116133847.GE2388@MiWiFi-R3L-srv\0"
  "ref\0YebK70Sx4w8zLfj/@xhacker\0"
  "From\0Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 19 Jan 2022 16:08:59 +0800\0"
- "To\0kexec@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>\0"
+ "Cc\0Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>"
+  Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
+  Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
+  Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
+  Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
+  Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
+  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
+  Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
+  Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
+  Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
+  x86@kernel.org
+  hpa@zytor.com
+  Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  kexec@lists.infradead.org
+ " Alexandre ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 01/18/22 at 10:13pm, Jisheng Zhang wrote:\n"
@@ -65,4 +83,4 @@
  "benefit is brought in if compiled in the unneeded code block. Do I miss\n"
  anything?
 
-9b807b6ce1aa94fafee32c3ff23c3041ff0a8f2e65cb5f584826150b3079069f
+a0ffaa885774750ae301e137733442e738ef6b1dd2e67a18cafcedcdc2eafbb2

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.