diff for duplicates of <20220119080859.GB4977@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 440bc48..aafd449 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -55,3 +55,9 @@ This is what I am worried about. Before, if CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is unset, those relevant codes are not compiled in. I can't see what benefit is brought in if compiled in the unneeded code block. Do I miss anything? + + +_______________________________________________ +linux-riscv mailing list +linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 7ae5d6e..866c9f9 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,9 +2,27 @@ "ref\020220116133847.GE2388@MiWiFi-R3L-srv\0" "ref\0YebK70Sx4w8zLfj/@xhacker\0" "From\0Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0" "Date\0Wed, 19 Jan 2022 16:08:59 +0800\0" - "To\0kexec@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>\0" + "Cc\0Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>" + Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> + Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> + Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> + Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> + Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> + Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> + Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> + Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> + Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> + x86@kernel.org + hpa@zytor.com + Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org + kexec@lists.infradead.org + " Alexandre ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 01/18/22 at 10:13pm, Jisheng Zhang wrote:\n" @@ -63,6 +81,12 @@ "This is what I am worried about. Before, if CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is\n" "unset, those relevant codes are not compiled in. I can't see what\n" "benefit is brought in if compiled in the unneeded code block. Do I miss\n" - anything? + "anything?\n" + "\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-riscv mailing list\n" + "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv -9b807b6ce1aa94fafee32c3ff23c3041ff0a8f2e65cb5f584826150b3079069f +3bcc9dfb439caee2acfbf211c2321caed2c66c61475fa5ba8f1e850c8838576a
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 440bc48..5c27214 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -55,3 +55,9 @@ This is what I am worried about. Before, if CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is unset, those relevant codes are not compiled in. I can't see what benefit is brought in if compiled in the unneeded code block. Do I miss anything? + + +_______________________________________________ +linux-arm-kernel mailing list +linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 7ae5d6e..add68b2 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -2,9 +2,27 @@ "ref\020220116133847.GE2388@MiWiFi-R3L-srv\0" "ref\0YebK70Sx4w8zLfj/@xhacker\0" "From\0Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0" "Date\0Wed, 19 Jan 2022 16:08:59 +0800\0" - "To\0kexec@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>\0" + "Cc\0Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>" + Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> + Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> + Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> + Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> + Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> + Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> + Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> + Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> + Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> + x86@kernel.org + hpa@zytor.com + Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org + kexec@lists.infradead.org + " Alexandre ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 01/18/22 at 10:13pm, Jisheng Zhang wrote:\n" @@ -63,6 +81,12 @@ "This is what I am worried about. Before, if CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is\n" "unset, those relevant codes are not compiled in. I can't see what\n" "benefit is brought in if compiled in the unneeded code block. Do I miss\n" - anything? + "anything?\n" + "\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n" + "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -9b807b6ce1aa94fafee32c3ff23c3041ff0a8f2e65cb5f584826150b3079069f +d5962740c7e22646a93d59f278a57f570df9eaa55cff3cb76ea2b614b4d5eaae
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest index 7ae5d6e..2f03e58 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N3/content_digest @@ -2,9 +2,27 @@ "ref\020220116133847.GE2388@MiWiFi-R3L-srv\0" "ref\0YebK70Sx4w8zLfj/@xhacker\0" "From\0Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0" "Date\0Wed, 19 Jan 2022 16:08:59 +0800\0" - "To\0kexec@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>\0" + "Cc\0Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>" + Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> + Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> + Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> + Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> + Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> + Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> + Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> + Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> + Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> + x86@kernel.org + hpa@zytor.com + Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org + kexec@lists.infradead.org + " Alexandre ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 01/18/22 at 10:13pm, Jisheng Zhang wrote:\n" @@ -65,4 +83,4 @@ "benefit is brought in if compiled in the unneeded code block. Do I miss\n" anything? -9b807b6ce1aa94fafee32c3ff23c3041ff0a8f2e65cb5f584826150b3079069f +a0ffaa885774750ae301e137733442e738ef6b1dd2e67a18cafcedcdc2eafbb2
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.