diff for duplicates of <20220120094539.GC18398@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 40cefd0..2f8e0fb 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -89,4 +89,10 @@ thank you and Alex, learned this now.
 Seems only static function has this effect. I tested your x86 patch,
 those two functions are all optimized out. If I remove the static,
 the entire reserve_crashkernel_low() exists, while reserve_crashkernel()
-will be optimized as a empty function.
+will be optimized as a empty function. 
+
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-riscv mailing list
+linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index feae2c6..b780b9c 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,9 +6,28 @@
  "ref\020220119093322.GC4977@MiWiFi-R3L-srv\0"
  "ref\0Yef5oz/XiZT/Pxfy@xhacker\0"
  "From\0Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:45:39 +0800\0"
- "To\0kexec@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>\0"
+ "Cc\0Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com>"
+  Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
+  Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
+  Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
+  Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
+  Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
+  Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
+  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
+  Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
+  Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
+  Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
+  x86@kernel.org
+  hpa@zytor.com
+  Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  kexec@lists.infradead.org
+ " Alexandre ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 01/19/22 at 07:44pm, Jisheng Zhang wrote:\n"
@@ -102,6 +121,12 @@
  "Seems only static function has this effect. I tested your x86 patch,\n"
  "those two functions are all optimized out. If I remove the static,\n"
  "the entire reserve_crashkernel_low() exists, while reserve_crashkernel()\n"
- will be optimized as a empty function.
+ "will be optimized as a empty function. \n"
+ "\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-riscv mailing list\n"
+ "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
 
-db98784db7c750f584fd58009074405006b4ed4b194f6b2b7e702476e2e0e19a
+0815f1950d2f27fd60295fe523f9680f477b4c816a853f59867e77b06ad405e9
