From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb@linux.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Jakob Naucke <Jakob.Naucke@ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] virtio: fix the condition for iommu_platform not supported
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:28:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220127142800.11d8f1be.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220125112112.44957075.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
ping^2
Also adding Brijesh and Daniel, as I believe you guys should be
interested in this, and I'm yet to receive review.
@Brijesh, Daniel: Can you confirm that AMD (SEV) and Power are affected
too, and that the fix works for your platforms as well?
Regards,
Halil
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:21:12 +0100
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> ping
>
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 13:02:38 +0100
> Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > The commit 04ceb61a40 ("virtio: Fail if iommu_platform is requested, but
> > unsupported") claims to fail the device hotplug when iommu_platform
> > is requested, but not supported by the (vhost) device. On the first
> > glance the condition for detecting that situation looks perfect, but
> > because a certain peculiarity of virtio_platform it ain't.
> >
> > In fact the aforementioned commit introduces a regression. It breaks
> > virtio-fs support for Secure Execution, and most likely also for AMD SEV
> > or any other confidential guest scenario that relies encrypted guest
> > memory. The same also applies to any other vhost device that does not
> > support _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM.
> >
> > The peculiarity is that iommu_platform and _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM collates
> > "device can not access all of the guest RAM" and "iova != gpa, thus
> > device needs to translate iova".
> >
> > Confidential guest technologies currently rely on the device/hypervisor
> > offering _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM, so that, after the feature has been
> > negotiated, the guest grants access to the portions of memory the
> > device needs to see. So in for confidential guests, generally,
> > _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM is about the restricted access to memory, but not
> > about the addresses used being something else than guest physical
> > addresses.
> >
> > This is the very reason for which commit f7ef7e6e3b ("vhost: correctly
> > turn on VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM") for, which fences _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
> > form the vhost device that does not need it, because on the vhost
> > interface it only means "I/O address translation is needed".
> >
> > This patch takes inspiration from f7ef7e6e3b ("vhost: correctly turn on
> > VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM"), and uses the same condition for detecting the
> > situation when _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM is requested, but no I/O translation
> > by the device, and thus no device capability is needed. In this
> > situation claiming that the device does not support iommu_plattform=on
> > is counter-productive. So let us stop doing that!
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > Reported-by: Jakob Naucke <Jakob.Naucke@ibm.com>
> > Fixes: 04ceb61a40 ("virtio: Fail if iommu_platform is requested, but
> > unsupported")
> > Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v1->v2:
> > * Commit message tweaks. Most notably fixed commit SHA (Michael)
> >
> > ---
> > hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c | 11 ++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c
> > index d23db98c56..c1578f3de2 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c
> > @@ -69,11 +69,6 @@ void virtio_bus_device_plugged(VirtIODevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > - if (has_iommu && !virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)) {
> > - error_setg(errp, "iommu_platform=true is not supported by the device");
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -
> > if (klass->device_plugged != NULL) {
> > klass->device_plugged(qbus->parent, &local_err);
> > }
> > @@ -88,6 +83,12 @@ void virtio_bus_device_plugged(VirtIODevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> > } else {
> > vdev->dma_as = &address_space_memory;
> > }
> > +
> > + if (has_iommu && vdev->dma_as != &address_space_memory
> > + && !virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)) {
> > + error_setg(errp, "iommu_platform=true is not supported by the device");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /* Reset the virtio_bus */
> >
> > base-commit: 6621441db50d5bae7e34dbd04bf3c57a27a71b32
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-17 12:02 [PATCH v2 1/1] virtio: fix the condition for iommu_platform not supported Halil Pasic
2022-01-25 10:21 ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-27 13:28 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2022-01-27 19:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2022-01-27 21:34 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-01-28 2:29 ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-28 9:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-28 11:02 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-01-28 11:48 ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-28 12:12 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-01-28 11:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220127142800.11d8f1be.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Jakob.Naucke@ibm.com \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=danielhb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.