From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE349C433F5 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245748AbiA0To1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:44:27 -0500 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:40732 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245708AbiA0ToX (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:44:23 -0500 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 8DDAD1C0B79; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 20:44:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 20:44:22 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/6] 5.10.95-rc1 review Message-ID: <20220127194422.GC2296@duo.ucw.cz> References: <20220127180258.131170405@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220127180258.131170405@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.95 release. > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (but we still hit the gmp.h compilation issue): CIP testing did not find any problems here: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-= 5.10.y Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) Best regards, Pavel --=20 DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany --NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCYfL2FgAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8tJXAJ9il0CSYosWVrOyixjaQd/Fj7JUVQCgl5PyYEhDDW5rSozLLkD32P2lTjY= =I2XY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU--