From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Steffen Weinreich <steve@weinreich.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19.y] netfilter: nft_payload: do not update layer 4 checksum when mangling fragments
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 13:04:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220129120444.GJ25922@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfUp/K7ZQoKcvfn+@kroah.com>
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:38:21PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> >
> > commit 4e1860a3863707e8177329c006d10f9e37e097a8 upstream.
> >
> > IP fragments do not come with the transport header, hence skip bogus
> > layer 4 checksum updates.
> >
> > Fixes: 1814096980bb ("netfilter: nft_payload: layer 4 checksum adjustment for pseudoheader fields")
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Steffen Weinreich <steve@weinreich.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> > ---
> > This is already in the 5.y branches but 4.19 needs a minor
> > tweak as ->fragoff member resides in xt sub-struct.
>
> I don't see this commit in the 5.10 or 5.4 branches, am I missing
> something?
Oh, indeed. Can you place this patch in 5.4 and 5.10 too?
Releases >= v5.14 should be covered given upstream commit works
as-is on those.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-29 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-28 11:38 [PATCH 4.19.y] netfilter: nft_payload: do not update layer 4 checksum when mangling fragments Florian Westphal
2022-01-28 11:43 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-01-29 11:50 ` Greg KH
2022-01-29 12:04 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2022-01-29 13:52 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220129120444.GJ25922@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steve@weinreich.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.