From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
hch@infradead.org, urezki@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-vmalloc-move-draining-areas-out-of-caller-context.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:02:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220131220202.B765EC340E8@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: mm/vmalloc: Move draining areas out of caller context
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mm-vmalloc-move-draining-areas-out-of-caller-context.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-vmalloc-move-draining-areas-out-of-caller-context.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-vmalloc-move-draining-areas-out-of-caller-context.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: mm/vmalloc: Move draining areas out of caller context
A caller initiates the drain procces from its context once the
drain threshold is reached or passed. There are at least two
drawbacks of doing so:
a) a caller can be a high-prio or RT task. In that case it can
stuck in doing the actual drain of all lazily freed areas.
This is not optimal because such tasks usually are latency
sensitive where the control should be returned back as soon
as possible in order to drive such workloads in time. See
96e2db456135 ("mm/vmalloc: rework the drain logic")
b) It is not safe to call vfree() during holding a spinlock due
to the vmap_purge_lock mutex. The was a report about this from
Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211222081026.484058-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn
Moving the drain to the separate work context addresses those
issues.
v1->v2:
- Added prefix "_work" to the drain worker function.
v2->v3:
- Remove the drain_vmap_work_in_progress. Extra queuing
is expectable under heavy load but it can be disregarded
because a work will bail out if nothing to be done.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220131144058.35608-1-urezki@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmalloc-move-draining-areas-out-of-caller-context
+++ a/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -792,6 +792,8 @@ RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS_MAX(static, free_vm
static void purge_vmap_area_lazy(void);
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(vmap_notify_list);
+static void drain_vmap_area_work(struct work_struct *work);
+static DECLARE_WORK(drain_vmap_work, drain_vmap_area_work);
static atomic_long_t nr_vmalloc_pages;
@@ -1723,18 +1725,6 @@ static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsig
}
/*
- * Kick off a purge of the outstanding lazy areas. Don't bother if somebody
- * is already purging.
- */
-static void try_purge_vmap_area_lazy(void)
-{
- if (mutex_trylock(&vmap_purge_lock)) {
- __purge_vmap_area_lazy(ULONG_MAX, 0);
- mutex_unlock(&vmap_purge_lock);
- }
-}
-
-/*
* Kick off a purge of the outstanding lazy areas.
*/
static void purge_vmap_area_lazy(void)
@@ -1745,6 +1735,20 @@ static void purge_vmap_area_lazy(void)
mutex_unlock(&vmap_purge_lock);
}
+static void drain_vmap_area_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ unsigned long nr_lazy;
+
+ do {
+ mutex_lock(&vmap_purge_lock);
+ __purge_vmap_area_lazy(ULONG_MAX, 0);
+ mutex_unlock(&vmap_purge_lock);
+
+ /* Recheck if further work is required. */
+ nr_lazy = atomic_long_read(&vmap_lazy_nr);
+ } while (nr_lazy > lazy_max_pages());
+}
+
/*
* Free a vmap area, caller ensuring that the area has been unmapped
* and flush_cache_vunmap had been called for the correct range
@@ -1771,7 +1775,7 @@ static void free_vmap_area_noflush(struc
/* After this point, we may free va at any time */
if (unlikely(nr_lazy > lazy_max_pages()))
- try_purge_vmap_area_lazy();
+ schedule_work(&drain_vmap_work);
}
/*
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from urezki@gmail.com are
mm-vmalloc-move-draining-areas-out-of-caller-context.patch
reply other threads:[~2022-01-31 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220131220202.B765EC340E8@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.