All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Makefile: Enable -Warray-bounds
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:02:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202202021320.ED0050E32@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220202160903.GA2337834@roeck-us.net>

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 08:09:03AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:11:17AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > With the recent fixes for flexible arrays and expanded FORTIFY_SOURCE
> > coverage, it is now possible to enable -Warray-bounds. Since both
> > GCC and Clang include -Warray-bounds in -Wall, we just need to stop
> > disabling it.
> > 
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> > Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
> > Co-developed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  Makefile | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index a4aca01a4835..af22b83cede7 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -1072,7 +1072,6 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, stringop-truncation)
> >  
> >  # We'll want to enable this eventually, but it's not going away for 5.7 at least
> >  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, zero-length-bounds)
> > -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-array-bounds
> >  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, stringop-overflow)
> >  
> >  # Another good warning that we'll want to enable eventually
> 
> alpha:defconfig:
> 
> In function '__memset',
>     inlined from '__bad_pagetable' at arch/alpha/mm/init.c:79:2:
> ./arch/alpha/include/asm/string.h:37:32: error: '__builtin_memset' offset [0, 8191] is out of the bounds [0, 0] [-Werror=array-bounds]
>    37 |                         return __builtin_memset(s, c, n);
>       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In function '__memset',
>     inlined from '__bad_page' at arch/alpha/mm/init.c:86:2:
> ./arch/alpha/include/asm/string.h:37:32: error: '__builtin_memset' offset [0, 8191] is out of the bounds [0, 0] [-Werror=array-bounds]
>    37 |                         return __builtin_memset(s, c, n);
>       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In function '__memset',
>     inlined from 'paging_init' at arch/alpha/mm/init.c:256:2:
> ./arch/alpha/include/asm/string.h:37:32: error: '__builtin_memset' offset [0, 8191] is out of the bounds [0, 0] [-Werror=array-bounds]
>    37 |                         return __builtin_memset(s, c, n);

Ugh, these all appear to be the same "gcc thinks a literal is an offset
from NULL" problem Arnd described:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/CAK8P3a1CT+-3J7Ufv9TQwRiV4i_+FF=-+phwSjWafyGuPfG+AA@mail.gmail.com

What's annoying is that these values, if stored in a variable, aren't
treated that way:
https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/ZjZR2tzRpx/

I guess having a common way to convert from an integer (or literal) into
a void * that GCC doesn't freak out about would be generally nice.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-02 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-18  8:11 [PATCH 0/5] Enable -Warray-bounds and -Wzero-length-bounds Kees Cook
2021-08-18  8:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] stddef: Add flexible array union helper Kees Cook
2021-08-18  8:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] treewide: Replace open-coded flex arrays in unions Kees Cook
2021-08-18  8:11   ` Kees Cook
2021-08-18  9:56   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-08-18  9:56     ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-08-18 21:51     ` Kees Cook
2021-08-18 21:51       ` Kees Cook
2021-08-18  8:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] treewide: Replace 0-element memcpy() destinations with flexible arrays Kees Cook
2021-08-18  8:11   ` Kees Cook
2021-08-18  8:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] Makefile: Enable -Warray-bounds Kees Cook
2022-02-02 16:09   ` Guenter Roeck
2022-02-02 20:56     ` Kees Cook
2022-02-02 23:33       ` Guenter Roeck
2022-02-03  3:03         ` Kees Cook
2022-02-02 22:02     ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-02-02 22:11     ` Kees Cook
2022-02-02 23:21       ` Guenter Roeck
2022-02-03  3:02         ` Kees Cook
2021-08-18  8:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] Makefile: Enable -Wzero-length-bounds Kees Cook
2021-08-25 21:17   ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202202021320.ED0050E32@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.