From: Paul Chaignon <paul@isovalent.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Subject: Packet pointers with 32-bit assignments
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 21:59:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220202205921.GA96712@Mem> (raw)
Hi,
We're hitting the following verifier error in Cilium, on bpf-next
(86c7ecad3bf8) with LLVM 10.0.0 and mcpu=v3.
; return (void *)(unsigned long)ctx->data;
2: (61) r9 = *(u32 *)(r7 +76)
; R7_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R9_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)
; return (void *)(unsigned long)ctx->data;
3: (bc) w6 = w9
; R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R9_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)
; if (data + tot_len > data_end)
4: (bf) r2 = r6
; R2_w=inv(id=1,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=inv(id=1,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
5: (07) r2 += 54
; R2_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=54,umax_value=4294967349,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ffffffff))
; if (data + tot_len > data_end)
6: (2d) if r2 > r1 goto pc+466
; R1_w=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=54,umax_value=4294967349,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ffffffff))
; tmp = a->d1 - b->d1;
7: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r6 +22)
R6 invalid mem access 'inv'
As seen above, the verifier loses track of the packet pointer at
instruction 3, which then leads to an invalid memory access. Since
ctx->data is on 32 bits, LLVM generated a 32-bit assignment at
instruction 3.
We're usually able to avoid this by removing all 32-bit comparisons and
additions with the 64-bit variables for data and data_end. But in this
case, all variables are already on 64 bits.
Is there maybe a compiler patch we're missing which prevents such
assignments? If not, could we teach the verifier to track and convert
such assignments?
Regards,
Paul
next reply other threads:[~2022-02-02 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-02 20:59 Paul Chaignon [this message]
2022-02-03 3:24 ` Packet pointers with 32-bit assignments Yonghong Song
2022-02-03 18:21 ` Paul Chaignon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220202205921.GA96712@Mem \
--to=paul@isovalent.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.