From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Cc: Bernie Huang <phhuang@realtek.com>,
"tony0620emma@gmail.com" <tony0620emma@gmail.com>,
"kvalo@kernel.org" <kvalo@kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtw88: fix use after free in rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req()
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:22:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220203082205.GD1978@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2bf144b4f5782c7909f783a0c5deb15e6186f032.camel@realtek.com>
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 07:59:47AM +0000, Pkshih wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-02-02 at 16:05 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > This code needs to use skb_queue_walk_safe() instead of skb_queue_walk()
> > because it frees the list iterator.
> >
> > Fixes: d95984b5580d ("rtw88: fix memory overrun and memory leak during hw_scan")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> > index ce9535cce723..2de0bb67bac6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> > @@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ static int rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> > {
> > struct cfg80211_scan_request *req = rtwvif->scan_req;
> > struct sk_buff_head list;
> > - struct sk_buff *skb;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb, *tmp;
> > u8 num = req->n_ssids, i, bands = 0;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -1889,7 +1889,7 @@ static int rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> > return _rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req(rtwdev, num * bands, &list);
> >
> > out:
> > - skb_queue_walk(&list, skb)
> > + skb_queue_walk_safe(&list, skb, tmp)
> > kfree_skb(skb);
> >
> > return ret;
>
>
> Oops, when I reivewed the patch "rtw88: fix memory overrun and memory leak during hw_scan",
> I did only focus on pointers of list head, but forget skb is freed that leads use after free.
>
> Could I have related fix with this patch?
>
Yes, thank you for noticing that. For some reason, on my system, Smatch
thinks that probe_req_list is always empty and doesn't warn about that
one because "it's impossible".
I will send a v2 patch.
regards,
dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-03 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-02 13:05 [PATCH] rtw88: fix use after free in rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req() Dan Carpenter
2022-02-03 7:59 ` Pkshih
2022-02-03 8:22 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220203082205.GD1978@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phhuang@realtek.com \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=tony0620emma@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.