From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Jakob Naucke <Jakob.Naucke@ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] virtio: fix the condition for iommu_platform not supported
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 17:06:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220203170635.1dd2b98d.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220202195438.379753-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 20:54:38 +0100
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> }
> @@ -82,9 +78,14 @@ void virtio_bus_device_plugged(VirtIODevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> return;
> }
>
> + vdev_has_iommu = virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
> if (klass->get_dma_as != NULL && has_iommu) {
> virtio_add_feature(&vdev->host_features, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
> vdev->dma_as = klass->get_dma_as(qbus->parent);
> + if (!vdev_has_iommu && vdev->dma_as != &address_space_memory) {
> + error_setg(errp,
> + "iommu_platform=true is not supported by the device");
> + }
I'm wondering, would it be wise to change the message? Since this is now
dependent on the VM/bus the device is plugged into the message might be a
little misleading: i.e. the very same device could work perfectly fine
with iommu_platform=true if the "surroundings" are different.
Maybe "the device has no IOMMU support (iommu_platform=true)" would be a
better option. On the other hand changing the message has its downsides
as well.
Also I realized that keeping the return after error_setg() might have
been a good idea for the case more logic is added at the end of the
function.
In any case I would like to address these, if necessary with a separate
patch. I don't want the fix to experience any further delays.
Regards,
Halil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-03 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-02 19:54 [PATCH v4 1/1] virtio: fix the condition for iommu_platform not supported Halil Pasic
2022-02-03 16:06 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2022-02-04 13:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-02-05 0:02 ` Halil Pasic
2022-02-05 1:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-02-07 11:30 ` Halil Pasic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220203170635.1dd2b98d.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Jakob.Naucke@ibm.com \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.