From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild@lists.01.org
Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-xilinx: fix for_each_child.cocci warnings
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 19:23:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220208112341.GA81244@abf1a29826c0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202202081907.UgCHaFan-lkp@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2331 bytes --]
CC: kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
CC: linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org
TO: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
CC: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
CC: Sai Krishna Potthuri <lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@xilinx.com>
CC: Tejas Prajapati Rameshchandra <tejaspra@xilinx.com>
CC: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
CC: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com>
CC: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC: linux-spi(a)vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-arm-kernel(a)lists.infradead.org
CC: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c:692:1-33: WARNING: Function "for_each_available_child_of_node" should have of_node_put() before return around line 697.
drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c:692:1-33: WARNING: Function "for_each_available_child_of_node" should have of_node_put() before break around line 703.
Semantic patch information:
False positives can be due to function calls within the for_each
loop that may encapsulate an of_node_put.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/iterators/for_each_child.cocci
Fixes: 3973536c4560 ("spi: spi-xilinx: Updated axi-qspi controller driver")
CC: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
tree: https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx xlnx_rebase_v5.15
head: 1183ce490adb103e5e569b8ebd74c50c885ddc05
commit: 3973536c456079bf3d09e9a97bf33d29422b183f [861/872] spi: spi-xilinx: Updated axi-qspi controller driver
:::::: branch date: 7 days ago
:::::: commit date: 7 days ago
Please take the patch only if it's a positive warning. Thanks!
spi-xilinx.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c
@@ -693,13 +693,16 @@ static int xilinx_spi_probe(struct platf
if (startup_block) {
ret = of_property_read_u32(nc, "reg",
&cs_num);
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ of_node_put(nc);
return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
ret = of_property_read_u32(nc, "spi-rx-bus-width",
&rx_bus_width);
if (!ret) {
xspi->rx_bus_width = rx_bus_width;
+ of_node_put(nc);
break;
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-08 11:28 [xilinx-xlnx:xlnx_rebase_v5.15 861/872] drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c:692:1-33: WARNING: Function "for_each_available_child_of_node" should have of_node_put() before return around line 697 kernel test robot
2022-02-08 11:23 ` kernel test robot [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-02-08 20:51 [PATCH] spi: spi-xilinx: fix for_each_child.cocci warnings Julia Lawall
2022-02-08 20:51 ` Julia Lawall
2022-02-08 20:51 ` Julia Lawall
2022-02-09 10:33 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2022-02-09 10:33 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2022-02-09 10:33 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2022-02-09 13:12 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-09 13:12 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-09 13:12 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-09 13:52 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2022-02-09 13:52 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2022-02-09 13:52 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2022-02-09 13:25 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-09 13:25 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-09 13:25 ` Mark Brown
2022-06-20 17:25 [xilinx-xlnx:xlnx_rebase_v5.15_LTS 861/1181] drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c:692:1-33: WARNING: Function "for_each_available_child_of_node" should have of_node_put() before return around line 697 kernel test robot
2022-06-20 17:19 ` [PATCH] spi: spi-xilinx: fix for_each_child.cocci warnings kernel test robot
2022-06-26 14:18 Julia Lawall
2022-06-26 14:18 ` Julia Lawall
2022-06-26 14:18 ` Julia Lawall
2022-06-27 12:23 ` Mark Brown
2022-06-27 12:23 ` Mark Brown
2022-06-27 12:23 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220208112341.GA81244@abf1a29826c0 \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.