From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: "Robert Święcki" <robert@swiecki.net>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>, "Will Drewry" <wad@chromium.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Get siginfo from unreaped task
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 09:52:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220213085212.cwzuqlrabpgbnbac@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CF5167CE-FA1C-4CEC-9EA8-5EE8041FE7C4@amacapital.net>
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 06:32:08PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > On Feb 12, 2022, at 3:24 AM, Robert Święcki <robert@swiecki.net> wrote:
> >
> > sob., 12 lut 2022 o 05:28 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> napisał(a):
> >>
> >> Make siginfo available through PTRACE_GETSIGINFO after process death,
> >> without needing to have already used PTRACE_ATTACH. Uses 48 more bytes
> >> in task_struct, though I bet there might be somewhere else we could
> >> stash a copy of it?
> >
> > An alternative way of accessing this info could be abusing the
> > waitid() interface, with some additional, custom to Linux, flag
> >
> > waitid(P_ALL, 0, &si, __WCHILDSIGINFO);
> >
> > which would change what is put into si.
> >
> > But maybe ptrace() is better, because it's mostly incompatible with
> > other OSes anyway on the behavior/flag level, while waitd() seems to
> > be POSIX/BSD standard, even if Linux specifies some additional flags.
> >
> >
>
> I had a kind of opposite thought, which is that it would be very nice
> to be able to get all the waitid() data without reaping a process or
> even necessarily being its parent. Maybe these can be combined? A
> new waitid() option like you’re suggesting could add siginfo (and
> might need permissions). And we could have a different waitid() flag
> that says “maybe not my child, don’t reap” (and also needs
> permissions).
>
> Although the “don’t reap” thing is fundamentally racy. What a sane
> process manager actually wants is an interface to read all this info
> from a pidfd, which means it all needs to get stuck in struct pid. And
/me briefly pops out from vacation
Agreed and not just siginfo I would expect(?). We already came to that
conclusion when we first introduced them.
> task_struct needs a completion or wait queue so you can actually wait
> for a pidfd to exit (unless someone already did this — I had patches a
> while back). And this would be awesome.
Currently, you can wait for a pidfd to exit via polling and you can use
a pidfd to pass it to waitid(P_PIDFD, pidfd, ...).
/me pops back into vacation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-13 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-12 4:28 [RFC] Get siginfo from unreaped task Kees Cook
2022-02-12 11:23 ` Robert Święcki
2022-02-13 2:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-02-13 8:52 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2022-02-14 20:07 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-14 22:08 ` Robert Święcki
2022-02-15 9:01 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220213085212.cwzuqlrabpgbnbac@wittgenstein \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=robert@swiecki.net \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.