From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: [PATCH v2 06/18] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:13:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20220216131332.1489939-7-arnd@kernel.org> References: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Ergh7cGYRE6HyKLVs6WQu1YmGVbzwTlMAQOcFSP4mwA=; b=YZMZnprjpBNSjH CTSOYjyDWrTjrBaC6UjDHMU/G9/J3ArDtB74Ud2hmeMYirELZjlqqUQsnFv265f3plhmqa1rV99K6 XsH1lzQ4piT+siY5z9/2MRcPErvEibGy9FwtauxNSIBgXCyqR0a/FaUkw1/ehxM92BWaPOyfkg8Hx bY1IKhJPiBAfGWddm+X7XkU3A8ZmZevq5rwmQytm99hrf2qzaX6qapD39fgaCbwM3KRY/Xxd3ijAX NnOgXfwBer4EwRvk0kWrvyJsdx8l7wLnWkaaa3vxHu+TiYY4qUTv7nqlvZYQOm8W60orKOxdU/Ip7 duss01y0uWBgOoq99ufQ==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1645017403; bh=FL3MwLnWcBo8JSN1gcn5jt3T6ZS9T2mg8wS4azHPBik=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y2Mjm03t4E3XFheH9yqQ6BGU3tXKnLCiOO/OwTUtf1lgBYcrWial86jpIz7PtRFIw avWAsmqN07Ju1N9aZWFEK6djiU4xxVsrWrIldgYbLMAINPBCIE+Gm9knAbw2ZJ5YQU 0At6HGqJSzJ5Apl70hqpM+UJUgnBEg8NWGL9S7AWW9MhT9XDK6p1AAJUM3JogLfwD2 1lrWss7flCDtYrrnfWGqToUCjUhfOxjIFu9y4/66Sjvu+ZaCBq+vjebdXEQiJu+If4 gZzt/RXBM8sHm8w1g75IDg7GXTr01G1sdmyHMVFaBZouzSWgTlBFAfWq558NJn3p1E Mzr/8UqWDZOoA== In-Reply-To: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+glpr-linux-riscv=m.gmane-mx.org@lists.infradead.org To: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com, green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com, deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at, x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.k From: Arnd Bergmann The way that access_ok() is defined on x86 is slightly different from most other architectures, and a bit more complex. The generic version tends to result in the best output on all architectures, as it results in single comparison against a constant limit for calls with a known size. There are a few callers of __range_not_ok(), all of which use TASK_SIZE as the limit rather than TASK_SIZE_MAX, but I could not see any reason for picking this. Changing these to call __access_ok() instead uses the default limit, but keeps the behavior otherwise. x86 is the only architecture with a WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() checking access_ok(), but it's probably best to leave that in place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 25 +++---------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h index 79c4869ccdd6..a59ba2578e64 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -16,33 +16,14 @@ * Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address. * Returns 0 if the range is valid, nonzero otherwise. */ -static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size) +static inline bool __access_ok(void __user *ptr, unsigned long size) { unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX; + unsigned long addr = ptr; - /* - * If we have used "sizeof()" for the size, - * we know it won't overflow the limit (but - * it might overflow the 'addr', so it's - * important to subtract the size from the - * limit, not add it to the address). - */ - if (__builtin_constant_p(size)) - return unlikely(addr > limit - size); - - /* Arbitrary sizes? Be careful about overflow */ - addr += size; - if (unlikely(addr < size)) - return true; - return unlikely(addr > limit); + return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size)); } -#define __access_ok(addr, size) \ -({ \ - __chk_user_ptr(addr); \ - !__chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size); \ -}) - #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void); # define WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() \ -- 2.29.2 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8C1C433F5 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233922AbiBPNR0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:17:26 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:34640 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233890AbiBPNRJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:17:09 -0500 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3EEF66225; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 05:16:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64ADBCE26F6; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5098AC340F3; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1645017403; bh=FL3MwLnWcBo8JSN1gcn5jt3T6ZS9T2mg8wS4azHPBik=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y2Mjm03t4E3XFheH9yqQ6BGU3tXKnLCiOO/OwTUtf1lgBYcrWial86jpIz7PtRFIw avWAsmqN07Ju1N9aZWFEK6djiU4xxVsrWrIldgYbLMAINPBCIE+Gm9knAbw2ZJ5YQU 0At6HGqJSzJ5Apl70hqpM+UJUgnBEg8NWGL9S7AWW9MhT9XDK6p1AAJUM3JogLfwD2 1lrWss7flCDtYrrnfWGqToUCjUhfOxjIFu9y4/66Sjvu+ZaCBq+vjebdXEQiJu+If4 gZzt/RXBM8sHm8w1g75IDg7GXTr01G1sdmyHMVFaBZouzSWgTlBFAfWq558NJn3p1E Mzr/8UqWDZOoA== From: Arnd Bergmann To: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com, green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com, deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at, x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Subject: [PATCH v2 06/18] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:13:20 +0100 Message-Id: <20220216131332.1489939-7-arnd@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> References: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org From: Arnd Bergmann The way that access_ok() is defined on x86 is slightly different from most other architectures, and a bit more complex. The generic version tends to result in the best output on all architectures, as it results in single comparison against a constant limit for calls with a known size. There are a few callers of __range_not_ok(), all of which use TASK_SIZE as the limit rather than TASK_SIZE_MAX, but I could not see any reason for picking this. Changing these to call __access_ok() instead uses the default limit, but keeps the behavior otherwise. x86 is the only architecture with a WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() checking access_ok(), but it's probably best to leave that in place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 25 +++---------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h index 79c4869ccdd6..a59ba2578e64 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -16,33 +16,14 @@ * Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address. * Returns 0 if the range is valid, nonzero otherwise. */ -static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size) +static inline bool __access_ok(void __user *ptr, unsigned long size) { unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX; + unsigned long addr = ptr; - /* - * If we have used "sizeof()" for the size, - * we know it won't overflow the limit (but - * it might overflow the 'addr', so it's - * important to subtract the size from the - * limit, not add it to the address). - */ - if (__builtin_constant_p(size)) - return unlikely(addr > limit - size); - - /* Arbitrary sizes? Be careful about overflow */ - addr += size; - if (unlikely(addr < size)) - return true; - return unlikely(addr > limit); + return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size)); } -#define __access_ok(addr, size) \ -({ \ - __chk_user_ptr(addr); \ - !__chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size); \ -}) - #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void); # define WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() \ -- 2.29.2 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:13:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 06/18] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition Message-Id: <20220216131332.1489939-7-arnd@kernel.org> List-Id: References: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com, green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com, deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at, x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org From: Arnd Bergmann The way that access_ok() is defined on x86 is slightly different from most other architectures, and a bit more complex. The generic version tends to result in the best output on all architectures, as it results in single comparison against a constant limit for calls with a known size. There are a few callers of __range_not_ok(), all of which use TASK_SIZE as the limit rather than TASK_SIZE_MAX, but I could not see any reason for picking this. Changing these to call __access_ok() instead uses the default limit, but keeps the behavior otherwise. x86 is the only architecture with a WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() checking access_ok(), but it's probably best to leave that in place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 25 +++---------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h index 79c4869ccdd6..a59ba2578e64 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -16,33 +16,14 @@ * Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address. * Returns 0 if the range is valid, nonzero otherwise. */ -static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size) +static inline bool __access_ok(void __user *ptr, unsigned long size) { unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX; + unsigned long addr = ptr; - /* - * If we have used "sizeof()" for the size, - * we know it won't overflow the limit (but - * it might overflow the 'addr', so it's - * important to subtract the size from the - * limit, not add it to the address). - */ - if (__builtin_constant_p(size)) - return unlikely(addr > limit - size); - - /* Arbitrary sizes? Be careful about overflow */ - addr += size; - if (unlikely(addr < size)) - return true; - return unlikely(addr > limit); + return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size)); } -#define __access_ok(addr, size) \ -({ \ - __chk_user_ptr(addr); \ - !__chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size); \ -}) - #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void); # define WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() \ -- 2.29.2 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1654C433F5 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Ergh7cGYRE6HyKLVs6WQu1YmGVbzwTlMAQOcFSP4mwA=; b=YZMZnprjpBNSjH CTSOYjyDWrTjrBaC6UjDHMU/G9/J3ArDtB74Ud2hmeMYirELZjlqqUQsnFv265f3plhmqa1rV99K6 XsH1lzQ4piT+siY5z9/2MRcPErvEibGy9FwtauxNSIBgXCyqR0a/FaUkw1/ehxM92BWaPOyfkg8Hx bY1IKhJPiBAfGWddm+X7XkU3A8ZmZevq5rwmQytm99hrf2qzaX6qapD39fgaCbwM3KRY/Xxd3ijAX NnOgXfwBer4EwRvk0kWrvyJsdx8l7wLnWkaaa3vxHu+TiYY4qUTv7nqlvZYQOm8W60orKOxdU/Ip7 duss01y0uWBgOoq99ufQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nKKAs-0075Xc-Qs; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:50 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nKKAp-0075Tl-8a; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:49 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63D25CE26EE; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5098AC340F3; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1645017403; bh=FL3MwLnWcBo8JSN1gcn5jt3T6ZS9T2mg8wS4azHPBik=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y2Mjm03t4E3XFheH9yqQ6BGU3tXKnLCiOO/OwTUtf1lgBYcrWial86jpIz7PtRFIw avWAsmqN07Ju1N9aZWFEK6djiU4xxVsrWrIldgYbLMAINPBCIE+Gm9knAbw2ZJ5YQU 0At6HGqJSzJ5Apl70hqpM+UJUgnBEg8NWGL9S7AWW9MhT9XDK6p1AAJUM3JogLfwD2 1lrWss7flCDtYrrnfWGqToUCjUhfOxjIFu9y4/66Sjvu+ZaCBq+vjebdXEQiJu+If4 gZzt/RXBM8sHm8w1g75IDg7GXTr01G1sdmyHMVFaBZouzSWgTlBFAfWq558NJn3p1E Mzr/8UqWDZOoA== From: Arnd Bergmann To: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com, green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com, deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at, x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Subject: [PATCH v2 06/18] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:13:20 +0100 Message-Id: <20220216131332.1489939-7-arnd@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> References: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220216_051647_654387_C770791A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.59 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Arnd Bergmann The way that access_ok() is defined on x86 is slightly different from most other architectures, and a bit more complex. The generic version tends to result in the best output on all architectures, as it results in single comparison against a constant limit for calls with a known size. There are a few callers of __range_not_ok(), all of which use TASK_SIZE as the limit rather than TASK_SIZE_MAX, but I could not see any reason for picking this. Changing these to call __access_ok() instead uses the default limit, but keeps the behavior otherwise. x86 is the only architecture with a WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() checking access_ok(), but it's probably best to leave that in place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 25 +++---------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h index 79c4869ccdd6..a59ba2578e64 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -16,33 +16,14 @@ * Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address. * Returns 0 if the range is valid, nonzero otherwise. */ -static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size) +static inline bool __access_ok(void __user *ptr, unsigned long size) { unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX; + unsigned long addr = ptr; - /* - * If we have used "sizeof()" for the size, - * we know it won't overflow the limit (but - * it might overflow the 'addr', so it's - * important to subtract the size from the - * limit, not add it to the address). - */ - if (__builtin_constant_p(size)) - return unlikely(addr > limit - size); - - /* Arbitrary sizes? Be careful about overflow */ - addr += size; - if (unlikely(addr < size)) - return true; - return unlikely(addr > limit); + return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size)); } -#define __access_ok(addr, size) \ -({ \ - __chk_user_ptr(addr); \ - !__chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size); \ -}) - #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void); # define WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() \ -- 2.29.2 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF796C433EF for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=OOh4R6pmZPEVVQmuEnQkaF0sgiWy8qavXzDpJcPIuMo=; b=3Hit/dEVpYlb2Z 8SwNaO1ONlbxZTP3W4rzvKGt447l60NOnb6nxAyphGSKP6DvVowDSpA90ggPtetDtPNeZj2Ua51VT vqjoEnyZE205OSlDrDq+wZzpw+12Y12V0wW6SHDpQdkBOn+fAlqkWbfBjw4HKTeBSlhJh2P+OGmbV kVIiJev3FgITrHA9mURZl4sesNKEdDlJI5OZHuG6eSPXsoFbmxWUqFm8MOghlARRXkcEM3yxHJL9T /Oq+7vevRkZGWc5ZDi/cMiTouEXS08SWmD901OLr364H0b0yKfIG3DoZARi49aEdTjXkYbuzHXdCJ 2dPC2N82p7nYghELF+yg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nKKAx-0075bU-TT; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:55 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nKKAp-0075Tl-8a; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:49 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63D25CE26EE; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5098AC340F3; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1645017403; bh=FL3MwLnWcBo8JSN1gcn5jt3T6ZS9T2mg8wS4azHPBik=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y2Mjm03t4E3XFheH9yqQ6BGU3tXKnLCiOO/OwTUtf1lgBYcrWial86jpIz7PtRFIw avWAsmqN07Ju1N9aZWFEK6djiU4xxVsrWrIldgYbLMAINPBCIE+Gm9knAbw2ZJ5YQU 0At6HGqJSzJ5Apl70hqpM+UJUgnBEg8NWGL9S7AWW9MhT9XDK6p1AAJUM3JogLfwD2 1lrWss7flCDtYrrnfWGqToUCjUhfOxjIFu9y4/66Sjvu+ZaCBq+vjebdXEQiJu+If4 gZzt/RXBM8sHm8w1g75IDg7GXTr01G1sdmyHMVFaBZouzSWgTlBFAfWq558NJn3p1E Mzr/8UqWDZOoA== From: Arnd Bergmann To: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com, green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com, deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at, x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Subject: [PATCH v2 06/18] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:13:20 +0100 Message-Id: <20220216131332.1489939-7-arnd@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> References: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220216_051647_654387_C770791A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.59 ) X-BeenThere: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on Synopsys ARC Processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-snps-arc" Errors-To: linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Arnd Bergmann The way that access_ok() is defined on x86 is slightly different from most other architectures, and a bit more complex. The generic version tends to result in the best output on all architectures, as it results in single comparison against a constant limit for calls with a known size. There are a few callers of __range_not_ok(), all of which use TASK_SIZE as the limit rather than TASK_SIZE_MAX, but I could not see any reason for picking this. Changing these to call __access_ok() instead uses the default limit, but keeps the behavior otherwise. x86 is the only architecture with a WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() checking access_ok(), but it's probably best to leave that in place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 25 +++---------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h index 79c4869ccdd6..a59ba2578e64 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -16,33 +16,14 @@ * Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address. * Returns 0 if the range is valid, nonzero otherwise. */ -static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size) +static inline bool __access_ok(void __user *ptr, unsigned long size) { unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX; + unsigned long addr = ptr; - /* - * If we have used "sizeof()" for the size, - * we know it won't overflow the limit (but - * it might overflow the 'addr', so it's - * important to subtract the size from the - * limit, not add it to the address). - */ - if (__builtin_constant_p(size)) - return unlikely(addr > limit - size); - - /* Arbitrary sizes? Be careful about overflow */ - addr += size; - if (unlikely(addr < size)) - return true; - return unlikely(addr > limit); + return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size)); } -#define __access_ok(addr, size) \ -({ \ - __chk_user_ptr(addr); \ - !__chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size); \ -}) - #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void); # define WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() \ -- 2.29.2 _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:13:20 +0100 Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v2 06/18] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition In-Reply-To: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> References: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> Message-ID: <20220216131332.1489939-7-arnd@kernel.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org From: Arnd Bergmann The way that access_ok() is defined on x86 is slightly different from most other architectures, and a bit more complex. The generic version tends to result in the best output on all architectures, as it results in single comparison against a constant limit for calls with a known size. There are a few callers of __range_not_ok(), all of which use TASK_SIZE as the limit rather than TASK_SIZE_MAX, but I could not see any reason for picking this. Changing these to call __access_ok() instead uses the default limit, but keeps the behavior otherwise. x86 is the only architecture with a WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() checking access_ok(), but it's probably best to leave that in place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 25 +++---------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h index 79c4869ccdd6..a59ba2578e64 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -16,33 +16,14 @@ * Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address. * Returns 0 if the range is valid, nonzero otherwise. */ -static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size) +static inline bool __access_ok(void __user *ptr, unsigned long size) { unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX; + unsigned long addr = ptr; - /* - * If we have used "sizeof()" for the size, - * we know it won't overflow the limit (but - * it might overflow the 'addr', so it's - * important to subtract the size from the - * limit, not add it to the address). - */ - if (__builtin_constant_p(size)) - return unlikely(addr > limit - size); - - /* Arbitrary sizes? Be careful about overflow */ - addr += size; - if (unlikely(addr < size)) - return true; - return unlikely(addr > limit); + return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size)); } -#define __access_ok(addr, size) \ -({ \ - __chk_user_ptr(addr); \ - !__chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size); \ -}) - #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void); # define WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() \ -- 2.29.2 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A5BCC433F5 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JzJTG32Zwz3dmW for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:19:30 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=Y2Mjm03t; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=145.40.73.55; helo=sin.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=arnd@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=Y2Mjm03t; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JzJQ6276Wz3bb7 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:16:46 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63D25CE26EE; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5098AC340F3; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:16:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1645017403; bh=FL3MwLnWcBo8JSN1gcn5jt3T6ZS9T2mg8wS4azHPBik=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y2Mjm03t4E3XFheH9yqQ6BGU3tXKnLCiOO/OwTUtf1lgBYcrWial86jpIz7PtRFIw avWAsmqN07Ju1N9aZWFEK6djiU4xxVsrWrIldgYbLMAINPBCIE+Gm9knAbw2ZJ5YQU 0At6HGqJSzJ5Apl70hqpM+UJUgnBEg8NWGL9S7AWW9MhT9XDK6p1AAJUM3JogLfwD2 1lrWss7flCDtYrrnfWGqToUCjUhfOxjIFu9y4/66Sjvu+ZaCBq+vjebdXEQiJu+If4 gZzt/RXBM8sHm8w1g75IDg7GXTr01G1sdmyHMVFaBZouzSWgTlBFAfWq558NJn3p1E Mzr/8UqWDZOoA== From: Arnd Bergmann To: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: [PATCH v2 06/18] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:13:20 +0100 Message-Id: <20220216131332.1489939-7-arnd@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> References: <20220216131332.1489939-1-arnd@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, dalias@libc.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, guoren@kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org, deller@gmx.de, x86@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, green.hu@gmail.com, shorne@gmail.com, monstr@monstr.eu, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, nickhu@andestech.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, dinguyen@kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, richard@nod.at, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Arnd Bergmann The way that access_ok() is defined on x86 is slightly different from most other architectures, and a bit more complex. The generic version tends to result in the best output on all architectures, as it results in single comparison against a constant limit for calls with a known size. There are a few callers of __range_not_ok(), all of which use TASK_SIZE as the limit rather than TASK_SIZE_MAX, but I could not see any reason for picking this. Changing these to call __access_ok() instead uses the default limit, but keeps the behavior otherwise. x86 is the only architecture with a WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() checking access_ok(), but it's probably best to leave that in place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 25 +++---------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h index 79c4869ccdd6..a59ba2578e64 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -16,33 +16,14 @@ * Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address. * Returns 0 if the range is valid, nonzero otherwise. */ -static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size) +static inline bool __access_ok(void __user *ptr, unsigned long size) { unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX; + unsigned long addr = ptr; - /* - * If we have used "sizeof()" for the size, - * we know it won't overflow the limit (but - * it might overflow the 'addr', so it's - * important to subtract the size from the - * limit, not add it to the address). - */ - if (__builtin_constant_p(size)) - return unlikely(addr > limit - size); - - /* Arbitrary sizes? Be careful about overflow */ - addr += size; - if (unlikely(addr < size)) - return true; - return unlikely(addr > limit); + return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size)); } -#define __access_ok(addr, size) \ -({ \ - __chk_user_ptr(addr); \ - !__chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size); \ -}) - #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void); # define WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() \ -- 2.29.2