Re: [PATCH 2/2] Allow VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to be negotiated for vdpa devices

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:27:14AM +0000, Gautam Dawar wrote:
> [GD>>] Yes , I agree a complete solution that will support the
> emulated virtio device with in_order rx/tx virtqueue functions will
> definitely be better but at the same time it will take considerable
> amount of time and effort. I also noticed that something similar
> (https://patchew.org/QEMU/1533833677-27512-1-git-send-email-i.maximets@samsung.com/)
> was proposed years ago which got dropped for similar reasons and it
> has been status quo since then.


Not applying a patch until it's complete is really the only
leverage maintainers have to push for complete patches.
Otherwise people keep adding half-baked code and hoping
that someone else does the rest of the work.

>  So, unless we know that this work is
> already in progress & will be up-streamed soon and if you don’t see
> any side-effects of this patch, we can get it integrated first and
> then this can be reverted when the complete solution is available.
> This would help in benchmarking performance boosts achieved with
> IN_ORDER feature.

You can just carry the patch in private for benchmarking I guess?

-- 
MST