From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the kspp-gustavo tree
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:05:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220217130537.GA930267@embeddedor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217141603.7a0ef4ed@canb.auug.org.au>
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 02:16:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/ieee80211.h
>
> between commit:
>
> fbe9ccfe809d ("treewide: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members")
>
> from the kspp-gustavo tree and commit:
>
> 6c36bcbfcef7 ("staging: r8188eu: remove unused structs from ieee80211.h")
>
> from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter removed the structs updated by the former) and
> can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
I just fixed this up in my -next tree.
Thanks for the report, Stephen.
--
Gustavo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-17 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-17 3:16 linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the kspp-gustavo tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-17 6:33 ` Greg KH
2022-02-17 13:05 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220217130537.GA930267@embeddedor \
--to=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.