Re: [meta-ti][dunfell][PATCH] conf: machine: am64xx-hs-evm: Fix naming of u-boot.img

["Denys Dmytriyenko" <denis@denix.org>]

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 01:43:31PM +0530, Aparna M via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> All the HS platforms generate the u-boot binary as u-boot.img_HS
> but the bootloader expects the binary to be named as u-boot.img
> 
> Due to this mismatch, script cannot find the required image to
> be added in the WIC image. Fix this by overwriting the
> UBOOT_IMAGE variable via conf file.

Can you please clarify which script cannot find the image? Thanks!
Also, how does it work for am65xx HS, j721e HS, j7200 HS? Why only am64xx HS?


> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@ti.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aparna M <a-m1@ti.com>
> ---
>  conf/machine/am64xx-hs-evm.conf | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/conf/machine/am64xx-hs-evm.conf b/conf/machine/am64xx-hs-evm.conf
> index 44e81463..781b8318 100644
> --- a/conf/machine/am64xx-hs-evm.conf
> +++ b/conf/machine/am64xx-hs-evm.conf
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ UBOOT_DTBO_OFFSET =      "0x00010000"
>  SPL_BINARY = "tispl.bin_HS"
>  SPL_BINARYNAME = "tispl.bin"
>  UBOOT_BINARY = "u-boot.img_HS"
> -IMAGE_BOOT_FILES = "${UBOOT_BINARY}"
> +UBOOT_IMAGE = "u-boot.img"
> +IMAGE_BOOT_FILES = "${UBOOT_IMAGE}"
>  
>  TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG = "${TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG_K3}"
> -- 
> 2.17.1