All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, ziy@nvidia.com,
	zhongjiang-ali@linux.alibaba.com, weixugc@google.com,
	shy828301@gmail.com, shakeelb@google.com, riel@surriel.com,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org, osalvador@suse.de,
	mhocko@suse.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	feng.tang@intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	ying.huang@intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + memory-tiering-skip-to-scan-fast-memory.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:45:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220222024524.12DDCC340E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: memory tiering: skip to scan fast memory
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     memory-tiering-skip-to-scan-fast-memory.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/memory-tiering-skip-to-scan-fast-memory.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/memory-tiering-skip-to-scan-fast-memory.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: memory tiering: skip to scan fast memory

If the NUMA balancing isn't used to optimize the page placement among
sockets but only among memory types, the hot pages in the fast memory node
couldn't be migrated (promoted) to anywhere.  So it's unnecessary to scan
the pages in the fast memory node via changing their PTE/PMD mapping to be
PROT_NONE.  So that the page faults could be avoided too.

In the test, if only the memory tiering NUMA balancing mode is enabled,
the number of the NUMA balancing hint faults for the DRAM node is reduced
to almost 0 with the patch.  While the benchmark score doesn't change
visibly.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220221084529.1052339-4-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: zhongjiang-ali <zhongjiang-ali@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/huge_memory.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 mm/mprotect.c    |   13 ++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/huge_memory.c~memory-tiering-skip-to-scan-fast-memory
+++ a/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 #include <linux/oom.h>
 #include <linux/numa.h>
 #include <linux/page_owner.h>
+#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlb.h>
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
@@ -1741,17 +1742,28 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struc
 	}
 #endif
 
-	/*
-	 * Avoid trapping faults against the zero page. The read-only
-	 * data is likely to be read-cached on the local CPU and
-	 * local/remote hits to the zero page are not interesting.
-	 */
-	if (prot_numa && is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd))
-		goto unlock;
+	if (prot_numa) {
+		struct page *page;
+		/*
+		 * Avoid trapping faults against the zero page. The read-only
+		 * data is likely to be read-cached on the local CPU and
+		 * local/remote hits to the zero page are not interesting.
+		 */
+		if (is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd))
+			goto unlock;
 
-	if (prot_numa && pmd_protnone(*pmd))
-		goto unlock;
+		if (pmd_protnone(*pmd))
+			goto unlock;
 
+		page = pmd_page(*pmd);
+		/*
+		 * Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa
+		 * balancing is disabled
+		 */
+		if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) &&
+		    node_is_toptier(page_to_nid(page)))
+			goto unlock;
+	}
 	/*
 	 * In case prot_numa, we are under mmap_read_lock(mm). It's critical
 	 * to not clear pmd intermittently to avoid race with MADV_DONTNEED
--- a/mm/mprotect.c~memory-tiering-skip-to-scan-fast-memory
+++ a/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/mm_inline.h>
 #include <linux/pgtable.h>
+#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -83,6 +84,7 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(st
 			 */
 			if (prot_numa) {
 				struct page *page;
+				int nid;
 
 				/* Avoid TLB flush if possible */
 				if (pte_protnone(oldpte))
@@ -109,7 +111,16 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(st
 				 * Don't mess with PTEs if page is already on the node
 				 * a single-threaded process is running on.
 				 */
-				if (target_node == page_to_nid(page))
+				nid = page_to_nid(page);
+				if (target_node == nid)
+					continue;
+
+				/*
+				 * Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa
+				 * balancing is disabled
+				 */
+				if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) &&
+				    node_is_toptier(nid))
 					continue;
 			}
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from ying.huang@intel.com are

mmmigrate-fix-establishing-demotion-target.patch
numa-balancing-add-page-promotion-counter.patch
numa-balancing-optimize-page-placement-for-memory-tiering-system.patch
memory-tiering-skip-to-scan-fast-memory.patch


             reply	other threads:[~2022-02-22  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-22  2:45 Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-02-01 22:20 + memory-tiering-skip-to-scan-fast-memory.patch added to -mm tree Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220222024524.12DDCC340E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhongjiang-ali@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.