From: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH] package/libiberty: use the same version as binutils
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:27:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220223142731.GA189337@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220223115506.1191031-1-john@metanate.com>
John, All,
On 2022-02-23 11:55 +0000, John Keeping spake thusly:
> libiberty is built from the binutils source but this package has
> languished on version 2.32 while the binutils package now uses 2.36.1 by
> default.
>
> Even between the 2.32 version and GDB 10.2 which is the default (and
> where host-libiberty is used instead of a version bundled in the GDB
> source) there are memory leak fixes and several improvements to
> demangling.
>
> Update the libiberty package to simply use the same version as binutils
> so that there is no need to remember to update this package in the
> future. Replace the .hash file with a symlink so that the binutils
> hashes are used automatically.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
> ---
> I'm not sure if this is this is the best way to improve the situation
> here - it's the smallest change to get something a bit more modern (in
> most circumstances), but I wonder if libiberty should use the GDB source
> instead as that's the one package we know both bundles libiberty source
> and will use host-libiberty in preference.
>
> package/libiberty/libiberty.hash | 6 +-----
> package/libiberty/libiberty.mk | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> mode change 100644 => 120000 package/libiberty/libiberty.hash
>
> diff --git a/package/libiberty/libiberty.hash b/package/libiberty/libiberty.hash
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 0dafcea520..0000000000
> --- a/package/libiberty/libiberty.hash
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
> -# From ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/binutils/releases/sha512.sum
> -sha512 d326408f12a03d9a61a9de56584c2af12f81c2e50d2d7e835d51565df8314df01575724afa1e43bd0db45cfc9916b41519b67dfce03232aa4978704492a6994a binutils-2.32.tar.xz
> -
> -# Locally computed, same as binutils.hash
> -sha256 56bdea73b6145ef6ac5259b3da390b981d840c24cb03b8e1cbc678de7ecfa18d COPYING.LIB
> diff --git a/package/libiberty/libiberty.hash b/package/libiberty/libiberty.hash
> new file mode 120000
> index 0000000000..e0655d3af3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/libiberty/libiberty.hash
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +../binutils/binutils.hash
> \ No newline at end of file
> diff --git a/package/libiberty/libiberty.mk b/package/libiberty/libiberty.mk
> index 6235a8b956..d0847bf298 100644
> --- a/package/libiberty/libiberty.mk
> +++ b/package/libiberty/libiberty.mk
> @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
> #
> ################################################################################
>
> -LIBIBERTY_VERSION = 2.32
> -LIBIBERTY_SOURCE = binutils-$(LIBIBERTY_VERSION).tar.xz
> +LIBIBERTY_VERSION = $(BINUTILS_VERSION)
> +LIBIBERTY_SOURCE = $(BINUTILS_SOURCE)
Although this works, this is by pure chance: binutils is included before
libiberty, so BINUTILS_VERSION is defined. But we try and avoid such a
situation, unless we explicitly guarantee the include ordering (eg. gcc,
fftw, util-linux, or previously, qt5).
Instead, in such a case, we prefer that the version strin is duplicated,
and a comment added above to note that both shoujld be updated in sync.
See for example bluez5_utils and bluez5_utils-headers, mesa3d and
mesa3d-headers.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
> LIBIBERTY_SITE = $(BR2_GNU_MIRROR)/binutils
> HOST_LIBIBERTY_DL_SUBDIR = binutils
>
> --
> 2.35.1
>
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-23 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-23 11:55 [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH] package/libiberty: use the same version as binutils John Keeping
2022-02-23 14:27 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2022-02-23 14:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2022-02-23 15:17 ` Yann E. MORIN
2022-02-23 16:39 ` John Keeping
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220223142731.GA189337@scaer \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=john@metanate.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.