From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/8] s390x: Add more tests for STSCH
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:08:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220224150820.3c20ff8d.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04daca6a-5863-d205-ea98-096163a2296a@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:39:07 +0100
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> We could check if bits 0,1 and 6,7 are also zero but I'm not sure if
> that's interesting since MSCH does not ignore those bits and should
> result in an operand exception when trying to set them.
>
> @Halil, @Pierre: Any opinions?
IMHO more testing doesn't hurt. But I don't have clarity on some aspect
of how the architecture is extended. What I'm trying to say is: I'm not
100% certain these bits must stay 0 and no-semantics-defined forever.
Regards,
Halil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-24 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-23 13:29 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/8] s390x: Extend instruction interception tests Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/8] s390x: Add more tests for MSCH Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/8] s390x: Add test for PFMF low-address protection Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/8] s390x: Add sck tests Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/8] s390x: Add tests for STCRW Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/8] s390x: Add more tests for SSCH Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/8] s390x: Add more tests for STSCH Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 15:16 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-23 15:39 ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-23 17:33 ` Nico Boehr
2022-02-24 0:13 ` Halil Pasic
2022-02-24 10:27 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-24 10:28 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-24 14:08 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 7/8] s390x: Add tests for TSCH Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 8/8] s390x: Add EPSW test Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 15:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/8] s390x: Extend instruction interception tests Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220224150820.3c20ff8d.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.