Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the block tree

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1097 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 22:06:22 +0000 broonie@kernel.org wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   block/blk-lib.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   0a3140ea0fae3 ("block: pass a block_device and opf to blk_next_bio")
> 
> from the block tree and commit:
> 
>   2988062985d59 ("scsi: block: Remove REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME support")
> 
> from the scsi-mkp tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc block/blk-lib.c
> index fc6ea52e74824,bf5254ccdb5f8..0000000000000
> --- a/block/blk-lib.c
> +++ b/block/blk-lib.c
> 
> (took the deletion of _WRITE_SAME from scsi-mkp)

This is now a conflict between the scsi tree and the block tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]