All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com>,
	Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] remoteproc: virtio: Create platform device for the remoteproc_virtio
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 11:53:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220304185308.GD1660165@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220126162405.1131323-5-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 05:24:05PM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> Define a platform driver to manage the remoteproc virtio device as
> a platform devices.
> 
> The platform device allows to pass rproc_vdev_data platform data to
> specify properties that are stored in the rproc_vdev structure.
> 
> Such approach will allow to preserve legacy remoteproc virtio device
> creation but also to probe the device using device tree mechanism.
> 
> remoteproc_virtio.c update:
>   - Add rproc_virtio_driver platform driver. The probe/remove ops replace
>     the rproc_rvdev_add_device/rproc_rvdev_remove_device functions.
>   - All reference to the rvdev->dev has been updated to rvdev-pdev->dev.
>   - rproc_rvdev_release is removed as associated to the rvdev device.
>   - The use of rvdev->kref counter is replaced by get/put_device on the
>     remoteproc virtio platform device.
>   - The vdev device no longer increments rproc device counter.
>     increment/decrement is done in rproc_virtio_probe/rproc_virtio_remove
>     function in charge of the vrings allocation/free.
> 
> remoteproc_core.c update:
>   Migrate from the rvdev device to the rvdev platform device.
>   From this patch, when a vdev resource is found in the resource table
>   the remoteproc core register a platform device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
> ---
> Update vs previous revision:
>   - squash following two patches
>     - [4/6] remoteproc: virtio: Create platform device for the remoteproc_virtio
>       https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/12/22/112
>     - [6/6] remoteproc: Instantiate the new remoteproc virtio platform device
>       https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/12/22/114
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     |  23 +++-
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h |   3 -
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c   | 151 +++++++++++------------
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h               |   6 +-
>  4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index eb6b43b71c2b..5b864c9c6244 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -467,6 +467,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>  	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
>  	struct rproc_vdev_data rvdev_data;
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
>  
>  	/* make sure resource isn't truncated */
>  	if (struct_size(rsc, vring, rsc->num_of_vrings) + rsc->config_len >
> @@ -495,9 +496,23 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
>  	rvdev_data.rsc_offset = offset;
>  	rvdev_data.rsc = rsc;
>  
> -	rvdev = rproc_rvdev_add_device(rproc, &rvdev_data);
> -	if (IS_ERR(rvdev))
> -		return PTR_ERR(rvdev);
> +	pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "rproc-virtio", rvdev_data.index, &rvdev_data,
> +					     sizeof(rvdev_data));
> +	if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
> +		dev_err(rproc->dev.parent,
> +			"failed to create rproc-virtio device\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR(pdev);
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * At this point the registered remoteproc virtio platform device should have been probed.
> +	 * Get the associated rproc_vdev struct to assign the vrings.
> +	 */
> +	rvdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	if (!rvdev) {
> +		platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

I can't find a reason to justify this check... Any error condition should be
handled in rproc_virtio_probe() and reported by IS_ERR(pdev) above.

Otherwise this patchset is holding together.

Thanks,
Mathieu

>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1237,7 +1252,7 @@ void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc)
>  
>  	/* clean up remote vdev entries */
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(rvdev, rvtmp, &rproc->rvdevs, node)
> -		kref_put(&rvdev->refcount, rproc_vdev_release);
> +		platform_device_unregister(rvdev->pdev);
>  
>  	rproc_coredump_cleanup(rproc);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index 7725b404afc6..175e64a1f3a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -45,10 +45,7 @@ int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index,
>  			    const char **fw_name);
>  
>  /* from remoteproc_virtio.c */
> -struct rproc_vdev *rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *rvdev_data);
> -void rproc_rvdev_remove_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev);
>  irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id);
> -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref);
>  
>  /* from remoteproc_debugfs.c */
>  void rproc_remove_trace_file(struct dentry *tfile);
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> index 1c4fd79ac1c5..de9f12fcd044 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>  #include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>  #include <linux/virtio.h>
> @@ -46,7 +47,11 @@ static int copy_dma_range_map(struct device *to, struct device *from)
>  
>  static struct rproc_vdev *vdev_to_rvdev(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  {
> -	return container_of(vdev->dev.parent, struct rproc_vdev, dev);
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> +
> +	pdev = container_of(vdev->dev.parent, struct platform_device, dev);
> +
> +	return platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  }
>  
>  static  struct rproc *vdev_to_rproc(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> @@ -341,13 +346,10 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev);
>  	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev);
> -	struct rproc *rproc = vdev_to_rproc(vdev);
>  
>  	kfree(vdev);
>  
> -	kref_put(&rvdev->refcount, rproc_vdev_release);
> -
> -	put_device(&rproc->dev);
> +	put_device(&rvdev->pdev->dev);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -363,7 +365,7 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  static int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
>  {
>  	struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc;
> -	struct device *dev = &rvdev->dev;
> +	struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev;
>  	struct virtio_device *vdev;
>  	struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -433,18 +435,8 @@ static int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
>  	vdev->dev.parent = dev;
>  	vdev->dev.release = rproc_virtio_dev_release;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * We're indirectly making a non-temporary copy of the rproc pointer
> -	 * here, because drivers probed with this vdev will indirectly
> -	 * access the wrapping rproc.
> -	 *
> -	 * Therefore we must increment the rproc refcount here, and decrement
> -	 * it _only_ when the vdev is released.
> -	 */
> -	get_device(&rproc->dev);
> -
>  	/* Reference the vdev and vring allocations */
> -	kref_get(&rvdev->refcount);
> +	get_device(dev);
>  
>  	ret = register_virtio_device(vdev);
>  	if (ret) {
> @@ -486,78 +478,57 @@ static int rproc_vdev_do_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
>  static void rproc_vdev_do_stop(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
>  {
>  	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(subdev, struct rproc_vdev, subdev);
> +	struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = device_for_each_child(&rvdev->dev, NULL, rproc_remove_virtio_dev);
> +	ret = device_for_each_child(dev, NULL, rproc_remove_virtio_dev);
>  	if (ret)
> -		dev_warn(&rvdev->dev, "can't remove vdev child device: %d\n", ret);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * rproc_rvdev_release() - release the existence of a rvdev
> - *
> - * @dev: the subdevice's dev
> - */
> -static void rproc_rvdev_release(struct device *dev)
> -{
> -	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(dev, struct rproc_vdev, dev);
> -
> -	of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev);
> -
> -	kfree(rvdev);
> +		dev_warn(dev, "can't remove vdev child device: %d\n", ret);
>  }
>  
> -struct rproc_vdev *
> -rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *rvdev_data)
> +static int rproc_virtio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct rproc_vdev_data *rvdev_data = dev->platform_data;
>  	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
> -	struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = rvdev_data->rsc;
> -	char name[16];
> +	struct rproc *rproc = container_of(dev->parent, struct rproc, dev);
> +	struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc;
>  	int i, ret;
>  
> -	rvdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*rvdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rvdev)
> -		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +	if (!rvdev_data)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	kref_init(&rvdev->refcount);
> +	rvdev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rvdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!rvdev)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	rvdev->id = rvdev_data->id;
>  	rvdev->rproc = rproc;
>  	rvdev->index = rvdev_data->index;
>  
> -	/* Initialise vdev subdevice */
> -	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index);
> -	rvdev->dev.parent = &rproc->dev;
> -	rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release;
> -	dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev->dev.parent), name);
> -	dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev);
> -
> -	ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		put_device(&rvdev->dev);
> -		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> -	}
> -
> -	ret = copy_dma_range_map(&rvdev->dev, rproc->dev.parent);
> +	ret = copy_dma_range_map(dev, rproc->dev.parent);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto free_rvdev;
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	/* Make device dma capable by inheriting from parent's capabilities */
> -	set_dma_ops(&rvdev->dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent));
> +	set_dma_ops(dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent));
>  
> -	ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&rvdev->dev,
> -					   dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent));
> +	ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent));
>  	if (ret) {
> -		dev_warn(&rvdev->dev,
> -			 "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... (%pe)\n",
> +		dev_warn(dev, "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... (%pe)\n",
>  			 dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent), ERR_PTR(ret));
>  	}
>  
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rvdev);
> +	rvdev->pdev = pdev;
> +
> +	rsc = rvdev_data->rsc;
> +
>  	/* parse the vrings */
>  	for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) {
>  		ret = rproc_parse_vring(rvdev, rsc, i);
>  		if (ret)
> -			goto free_rvdev;
> +			return ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* remember the resource offset*/
> @@ -577,18 +548,30 @@ rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_data *rvdev_data)
>  
>  	rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);
>  
> -	return rvdev;
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "virtio dev %d added\n",  rvdev->index);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We're indirectly making a non-temporary copy of the rproc pointer
> +	 * here, because the platform devicer or the vdev device will indirectly
> +	 * access the wrapping rproc.
> +	 *
> +	 * Therefore we must increment the rproc refcount here, and decrement
> +	 * it _only_ on platform remove.
> +	 */
> +	get_device(&rproc->dev);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  
>  unwind_vring_allocations:
>  	for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
>  		rproc_free_vring(&rvdev->vring[i]);
> -free_rvdev:
> -	device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> -	return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -void rproc_rvdev_remove_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev)
> +static int rproc_virtio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> +	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>  	struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc;
>  	struct rproc_vring *rvring;
>  	int id;
> @@ -600,19 +583,29 @@ void rproc_rvdev_remove_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev)
>  
>  	rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);
>  	rproc_unregister_rvdev(rvdev);
> -	device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> -}
>  
> -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref)
> -{
> -	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(ref, struct rproc_vdev, refcount);
> -	struct rproc_vring *rvring;
> -	int id;
> +	of_reserved_mem_device_release(&pdev->dev);
>  
> -	for (id = 0; id < ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring); id++) {
> -		rvring = &rvdev->vring[id];
> -		rproc_free_vring(rvring);
> -	}
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "virtio dev %d removed\n",  rvdev->index);
>  
> -	rproc_rvdev_remove_device(rvdev);
> +	/* The remote proc device can be removed */
> +	put_device(&rproc->dev);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +/* Platform driver */
> +static const struct of_device_id rproc_virtio_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "rproc-virtio", },
> +	{},
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver rproc_virtio_driver = {
> +	.probe		= rproc_virtio_probe,
> +	.remove		= rproc_virtio_remove,
> +	.driver		= {
> +		.name	= "rproc-virtio",
> +		.of_match_table	= rproc_virtio_match,
> +	},
> +};
> +builtin_platform_driver(rproc_virtio_driver);
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index e0600e1e5c17..7951a3e2b62a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -614,9 +614,8 @@ struct rproc_vring {
>  
>  /**
>   * struct rproc_vdev - remoteproc state for a supported virtio device
> - * @refcount: reference counter for the vdev and vring allocations
>   * @subdev: handle for registering the vdev as a rproc subdevice
> - * @dev: device struct used for reference count semantics
> + * @pdev: remoteproc virtio platform device
>   * @id: virtio device id (as in virtio_ids.h)
>   * @node: list node
>   * @rproc: the rproc handle
> @@ -625,10 +624,9 @@ struct rproc_vring {
>   * @index: vdev position versus other vdev declared in resource table
>   */
>  struct rproc_vdev {
> -	struct kref refcount;
>  
>  	struct rproc_subdev subdev;
> -	struct device dev;
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
>  
>  	unsigned int id;
>  	struct list_head node;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-04 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-26 16:24 [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] remoteproc: restructure the remoteproc VirtIO device Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-26 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] remoteproc: core: Introduce virtio device add/remove functions Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-03-04 18:29   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-01-26 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] remoteproc: core: Introduce rproc_register_rvdev function Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-03-04 18:39   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-01-26 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] remoteproc: Move rproc_vdev management to remoteproc_virtio.c Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-03-04 18:45   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-01-26 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] remoteproc: virtio: Create platform device for the remoteproc_virtio Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-03-04 18:53   ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2022-03-07  8:44     ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2022-02-15  8:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] remoteproc: restructure the remoteproc VirtIO device Peng Fan
2022-02-15 11:11   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2022-02-22 13:07     ` Peng Fan
2022-02-28 18:58 ` Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220304185308.GD1660165@p14s \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=bruce.ashfield@xilinx.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanos@xilinx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.