From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] tmpfs: do not allocate pages on read
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 10:27:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220306092709.GA22883@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9c2f38f-5eb8-5d30-40fa-93e88b5fbc51@google.com>
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 09:09:01PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> It's not quite as simple as just removing the test (as Mikulas did):
> xfstests generic/013 hung because splice from tmpfs failed on page not
> up-to-date and page mapping unset. That can be fixed just by marking
> the ZERO_PAGE as Uptodate, which of course it is; doing so here in
> shmem_file_read_iter() is distasteful, but seems to be the best way.
Shouldn't we set ZERO_PAGE uptodate during early init code as it, uh,
is per definition uptodate all the time?
>
> My intention, though, was to stop using the ZERO_PAGE here altogether:
> surely iov_iter_zero() is better for this case? Sadly not: it relies
> on clear_user(), and the x86 clear_user() is slower than its copy_user():
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2f5ca5e4-e250-a41c-11fb-a7f4ebc7e1c9@google.com/
Oh, that's sad as just using clear_user would be the right thing to
here.
> But while we are still using the ZERO_PAGE, let's stop dirtying its
> struct page cacheline with unnecessary get_page() and put_page().
>
> Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
But except for maybe making sure that ZERO_PAGE is always marked
uptodate this does looks good to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-06 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-05 5:09 [PATCH mmotm] tmpfs: do not allocate pages on read Hugh Dickins
2022-03-06 9:27 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-03-06 22:56 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-03-06 22:59 ` [PATCH mmotm v2] " Hugh Dickins
2022-03-07 6:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 17:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-08 21:46 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220306092709.GA22883@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.