From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Cc: smatch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: alloc_page leaks tracing
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 00:12:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220311211215.GN3315@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82B7079C-AD17-4E5E-A245-71E9ED53E5A3@linuxhacker.ru>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 04:30:42PM -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>
> Thanks, I added this and there’s still no detection.
> Example code:
>
> __page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> if (__page == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> req = cfs_crypto_hash_init(cfs_alg, NULL, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(req)) {
> CERROR("%s: unable to initialize checksum hash %s\n",
> tgt_name(tgt), cfs_crypto_hash_name(cfs_alg));
> return PTR_ERR(req);
> }
>
> buffer = kmap(__page);
>
>
> diff --git a/check_unwind.c b/check_unwind.c
> index 569792ad..7611f377 100644
> --- a/check_unwind.c
> +++ b/check_unwind.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,11 @@ static struct ref_func_info func_table[] = {
>
> { "ieee80211_alloc_hw", ALLOC, -1, "$", &valid_ptr_min_sval, &valid_ptr_max_sval },
> { "ieee80211_free_hw", RELEASE, 0, "$" },
> + { "alloc_pages", ALLOC, -1, "$", &valid_ptr_min_sval, &valid_ptr_max_sval },
> + { "alloc_page", ALLOC, -1, "$", &valid_ptr_min_sval, &valid_ptr_max_sval },
> + { "__get_free_pages", ALLOC, -1, "$", &valid_ptr_min_sval, &valid_ptr_max_sval },
> + { "free_pages", RELEASE, 0, "$" },
> + { "__free_page", RELEASE, 0, "$" },
> };
Hey Oleg,
Sorry, I should have tested this better...
There are two issues. The easy issue is that apparently I didn't stop
to consider error pointers as a failure return.
The more complicated problem is that the allocation hook will only
trigger for cases where Smatch knows what the return is. Right now
Smatch knows that alloc_pages either returns NULL, or non-NULL (but
potentially error pointers). This is return_implies_param_key_exact()
vs return_implies_param_key().
Of course, I changed it to _exact() deliberately to silence false
positives. I don't remember the details so I'll retest tonight and look
again on Monday.
An easy "fix" would be to add "alloc_pages 1-u64max 4096-ptr_max" so it
gets hardcoded on the next db rebuild, but that's kind of a hack as
well.
diff --git a/check_unwind.c b/check_unwind.c
index 569792ad5a57..c3015cca3374 100644
--- a/check_unwind.c
+++ b/check_unwind.c
@@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ static struct ref_func_info func_table[] = {
{ "ieee80211_alloc_hw", ALLOC, -1, "$", &valid_ptr_min_sval, &valid_ptr_max_sval },
{ "ieee80211_free_hw", RELEASE, 0, "$" },
+
+ { "alloc_pages", ALLOC, -1, "$", &valid_ptr_min_sval, &valid_ptr_max_sval },
+ { "__get_free_pages", ALLOC, -1, "$", &valid_ptr_min_sval, &valid_ptr_max_sval },
+ { "free_pages", RELEASE, 0, "$" },
};
static struct smatch_state *unmatched_state(struct sm_state *sm)
@@ -237,11 +241,14 @@ enum {
static int success_fail_positive(struct range_list *rl)
{
if (!rl)
- return UNKNOWN;
+ return SUCCESS;
if (sval_is_negative(rl_min(rl)) && sval_is_negative(rl_max(rl)))
return FAIL;
+ if (type_is_ptr(rl_type(rl)) && is_err_or_null(rl))
+ return FAIL;
+
if (rl_min(rl).value == 0)
return SUCCESS;
@@ -334,7 +341,7 @@ void check_unwind(int id)
if (info->call_back) {
add_function_hook(info->name, info->call_back, info);
} else if (info->implies_start && info->type == ALLOC) {
- return_implies_param_key_exact(info->name,
+ return_implies_param_key(info->name,
*info->implies_start,
*info->implies_end,
&return_param_alloc,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-11 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-08 17:28 alloc_page leaks tracing Oleg Drokin
2022-03-10 9:42 ` Dan Carpenter
[not found] ` <82B7079C-AD17-4E5E-A245-71E9ED53E5A3@linuxhacker.ru>
2022-03-11 21:12 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2022-03-22 8:05 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-25 6:48 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220311211215.GN3315@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=smatch@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.